Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #140:Pattern 2.6 not Python 3 compatible #144

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

abhijeetchauhan
Copy link

There was a syntax error in print.Due to recent changes in python3.
Reference: https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.0.html#print-is-a-function

@dav009
Copy link

dav009 commented Mar 15, 2016

👍 be aware that many other exceptions followed after this one was fixed.
were you able to set up your branch locally?

@ExplodingCabbage
Copy link

recent changes in python3

These aren't recent; Python 3.0 was released 8 years ago.

Fix #140:Pattern 2.6 not Python 3 compatible

I haven't looked in detail at the efforts to make Pattern compatible with Python 3, but I think much more is needed than this; see #62.

@abhijeetchauhan
Copy link
Author

You, guys are correct.I tried using 2to3 refractoring tool but many errors were coming up.

@ExplodingCabbage
Copy link

Perhaps close this PR, then?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants