Skip to content

snapshot: Improve memory utilization of snapshot fetcher #2715

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 9, 2025

Conversation

kim
Copy link
Contributor

@kim kim commented May 8, 2025

  • Use a PagePool for deserializing pages
  • Use a similarly shaped BufPool for raw object data and decompression
  • Serialize BSATN directly to a hasher where possible
  • Commentary

Expected complexity level and risk

1.5

Testing

Covered by existing tests

- Use a `PagePool` for deserializing pages
- Use a similarly shaped `BufPool` for raw object data and decompression
- Serialize BSATN directly to a hasher where possible
- Commentary
@kim kim requested a review from Centril May 8, 2025 16:36
@kim kim enabled auto-merge May 9, 2025 06:03
@kim kim added this pull request to the merge queue May 9, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks May 9, 2025
@kim kim added this pull request to the merge queue May 9, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 763acb7 May 9, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@kim kim deleted the kim/snapshot/mem branch May 9, 2025 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants