-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 583
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vote: moving CESQL spec to v1 #1293
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Calum Murray <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Calum Murray <[email protected]>
I'm afraid I'm absolutely slammed with other things at the moment, and won't be able to look again. I believe all the issues I raised before have been addressed though. |
Note, there may need to another PR after this one to fix-up some of the main READE links, but we'll do those after we create the new release branch. In case anyone was wondering.... @jskeet is that an implied +1 or "abstain" ? |
Happy for it to be a +1 |
MSFT votes +1 |
Congratulations on this milestone! While I formally abstain, I support this overdue release. |
Signed-off-by: Calum Murray <[email protected]>
SAP votes +1 |
+1 |
Red Hat votes +1 |
Vote tally:
Non-voting-rights members: Yes: Jesse, Remi, Ben, Leo, Abstain: Jem |
+1, yes! |
Approved PR changes and move to v1.0 on the 6/13 call. See comment above for voting summary. |
We'll be using this PR to vote on moving the CESQL to v1.0.
The following community members have voting rights: Google, IBM/Red Hat, Microsoft, SAP, Mark Peek, Erik Erikson, Tommy Chung.
Other folks are welcome, and encouraged, to vote as well, but only "voting rights" members votes will be counted.
Please vote either with a thumb-up or thumb-down emoji on this comment, or with a new github comment.
The vote will close at the start of the next weekly call - June 13, 12pm ET.
Note: technically, IBM/Red Hat forgot to change their representatives in our tracking spreadsheet so they're not officially listed as having voting rights. However, @Cali0707 has been at the last 4 meetings so Red Hat really should have voting rights. I'll work with Calum on getting the spreadsheet updated.
Additionally, Mark Peek was listed as the rep for VMWare but he moved on earlier this year and the spreadsheet was not updated, so I've adjusted the comments in this PR to reflect this.
Proposed Changes
Release Note