Add additional output fields to pages deployments

[courtney-sims]

What this PR solves / how to test

cloudflare/wrangler-action#300

Adds additional outputs to wrangler's artifact mechanism for pages deploys. This allows wrangler-action to pull from wrangler's artifacts to get info about pages deploys, adding parity to the outputs pages-action provides.

Test by installing the wrangler prerelease in a local pages project, setting WRANGLER_OUTPUT_FILE_DIRECTORY in the local environment, running a pages deploy, and checking the output file.

Author has addressed the following

• Tests
  • TODO (before merge)
  • Tests included
  • Tests not necessary because:
• E2E Tests CI Job required? (Use "e2e" label or ask maintainer to run separately)
  • I don't know
  • Required
  • Not required because: This code is not covered by those tests.
• Changeset (Changeset guidelines)
  • TODO (before merge)
  • Changeset included
  • Changeset not necessary because:
• Public documentation
  • TODO (before merge)
  • Cloudflare docs PR(s):
  • Documentation not necessary because: Internal usage for now

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9724518

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages

Name	Type
wrangler	Minor
@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

A wrangler prerelease is available for testing. You can install this latest build in your project with:

npm install --save-dev https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/11369247844/npm-package-wrangler-6990

You can reference the automatically updated head of this PR with:

npm install --save-dev https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/prs/6990/npm-package-wrangler-6990

Or you can use npx with this latest build directly:

npx https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/11369247844/npm-package-wrangler-6990 dev path/to/script.js

Additional artifacts:

npx https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/11369247844/npm-package-create-cloudflare-6990 --no-auto-update

npm install https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/11369247844/npm-package-cloudflare-kv-asset-handler-6990

npm install https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/11369247844/npm-package-miniflare-6990

npm install https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/11369247844/npm-package-cloudflare-pages-shared-6990

npm install https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/11369247844/npm-package-cloudflare-vitest-pool-workers-6990

npm install https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/11369247844/npm-package-cloudflare-workers-editor-shared-6990

npm install https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/11369247844/npm-package-cloudflare-workers-shared-6990

Note that these links will no longer work once the GitHub Actions artifact expires.

---

[email protected] includes the following runtime dependencies:

Package	Constraint	Resolved
miniflare	workspace:*	3.20241011.0
workerd	1.20241011.1	1.20241011.1
workerd --version	1.20241011.1	2024-10-11

Please ensure constraints are pinned, and miniflare/workerd minor versions match.

[petebacondarwin]

Thanks @courtney-sims.

You'll need a changeset and some tests. See https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/blob/09b50927a62731f8aa621b9d872d10d1900a60a5/packages/wrangler/src/__tests__/output.test.ts

But also I think it might be safest if you create a new OutputEntry, rather than updating a current one. These entries are a contract between Wrangler and other tools that have an expectation of what is in the entry. Although this is adding new fields so would probably not break a downstream client of the output, you might have a situation where a client expects fields to be there which are not?

Either way, I think that the wrangler-action would need to ensure that the version of Wranger being used was new enough that this output included these fields.