Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Combine + simplify nav/masthead #18

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2015
Merged

Combine + simplify nav/masthead #18

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2015

Conversation

tylersticka
Copy link
Member

Now uses top-down drawer similar to Solid, with lighter colors that are mostly inherited by default:

pr

Does not yet address IE9 issues related to dependency on classList, but paves the way for that to be a much simpler change in a future PR.


Refs: #14

@saralohr @nicolemors

Now uses top-down drawer similar to Solid.

Does not yet address IE9 issues related to dependency on classList, but paves the way for that to be a much simpler change.

Refs: #14
box-sizing: border-box;
width: var(--Layout-nav-width);
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this margin still needed here since it gets set above?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope, good catch! I'll remove.

@erikjung
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good overall. Only other nitpick from me is regarding the mix of em and rem used for margin and padding values. Can we make some custom properties for spacing and normalize the values a bit?

This is also something that can be deferred to another issue and addressed later. I assume there are similar opportunities for cleanup elsewhere. Thoughts?

@tylersticka
Copy link
Member Author

@erikjung Sorry for the delay in responding, it's just a complicated question for me to answer.

I feel like I could rewrite and simplify the whole UI at this point, but the more changes I make the bigger pain it is to back-port those to this generator repository. This (mostly reductive) PR took two separate attempts and three separate instances to create (the generator, a local dev repo and a test instance of the generator output), and I spent a lot more time on it than I anticipated.

If tools existed for developing, viewing and pushing updates to the UI in a single location, I honestly think I could revise the whole thing in a couple of days. It's pretty frustrating as-is, hence my lack of enthusiasm for big, sweeping changes.

@erikjung
Copy link
Contributor

👍 LGTM. We can address other minor things later.

tylersticka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2015
@tylersticka tylersticka merged commit da1d1ed into master Dec 28, 2015
@tylersticka tylersticka deleted the feature-nav_update branch December 28, 2015 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants