Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hazard Joe Naming #3785

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

Ben10083
Copy link
Contributor

@Ben10083 Ben10083 commented Jul 2, 2023

About the pull request

Hazard Joes are now labeled as 'Hazard Joes' in name

Explain why it's good for the game

Hazard Joes have different responsibilities than a Working Joe, and as such it is important to be able to tell what type a Joe is at a glance (outside of a face to face conversation)

Testing Photographs and Procedure

Screenshots & Videos

image
Name change

Changelog

🆑
qol: Hazard Joes are now named Hazard Joe in their name.
/:cl:

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Quality of Life Make the game harder to play label Jul 2, 2023
@QuickLode
Copy link
Contributor

QuickLode commented Jul 3, 2023

I don't think this is really necessary because humans won't be asking for a specific type of Joe(they never do).

Tasks are petitioned or requested to APOLLO, and then APOLLO will delegate that to a Joe best suited to accomplish that task. Based on locality, status, directives and abilities.

It takes a bit of the mystery out of the equation - especially since these Joes were never seen by the public on most stations. They are only in highly secure areas. But that aside, it just feels unnecessary.

@Ben10083
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ben10083 commented Jul 3, 2023

Excellent point, will be closing PR.

@Ben10083 Ben10083 closed this Jul 3, 2023
@Ben10083 Ben10083 deleted the Hazard_Joe_Name branch July 3, 2023 03:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Quality of Life Make the game harder to play
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants