Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: perf diff #699

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

fix: perf diff #699

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

elrrrrrrr
Copy link
Member

@elrrrrrrr elrrrrrrr commented Jun 13, 2024

optimize binary sync perf , closes #698

  • ♻️ calculate the latestItem only once for the same fetchItems.

binary 同步性能优化,close #698

  • ♻️ binary 最新版本比对时,相同 fetchItems 仅计算一次。

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved logic for identifying the latest item in synchronization processes, ensuring more accurate date comparisons.

@elrrrrrrr elrrrrrrr requested a review from fengmk2 June 13, 2024 12:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The code modification in the BinarySyncerService.ts file introduces a new variable latestItem of type BinaryItem | undefined.. This variable is used to improve the logic for identifying the latest item based on date comparisons, specifically aiming to optimize the performance of item difference computations (diff).

Changes

Files Summary
app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts Introduced a latestItem variable to improve date comparison logic for identifying the latest item.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant BinarySyncerService
    alt Request for Latest Item
        User->>BinarySyncerService: Request latest item
        BinarySyncerService->>BinarySyncerService: Loop through items, comparing dates
        BinarySyncerService->>User: Return latest item
    end
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve performance of item diff (#698)

Poem

In the realm of binary light,
Where bits and bytes take flight,
A latest item we do seek,
To enhance and boost our peak.
Code flows with newfound grace,
Efficiency now sets the pace.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@elrrrrrrr elrrrrrrr added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 038736d and 35ed350.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts (2 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: test-mysql57-fs-nfs (22, ubuntu-latest)
app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts

[failure] 283-283:
'isLatestItem' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead

GitHub Check: test-mysql57-fs-nfs (20, ubuntu-latest)
app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts

[failure] 283-283:
'isLatestItem' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead

GitHub Check: test-mysql57-fs-nfs (18, ubuntu-latest)
app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts

[failure] 283-283:
'isLatestItem' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead

Additional comments not posted (1)
app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts (1)

Line range hint 254-283: Optimized diff method to calculate 'latestItem' only once per fetch items.

This change effectively optimizes the performance by reducing redundant calculations. The introduction of latestItem to store the latest item and the conditional check to only calculate it once per set of fetch items is a good use of resources, aligning with the objectives of PR #699 and Issue #698.

Tools
GitHub Check: test-mysql57-fs-nfs (22, ubuntu-latest)

[failure] 283-283:
'isLatestItem' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead

GitHub Check: test-mysql57-fs-nfs (20, ubuntu-latest)

[failure] 283-283:
'isLatestItem' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead

GitHub Check: test-mysql57-fs-nfs (18, ubuntu-latest)

[failure] 283-283:
'isLatestItem' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead

app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@fengmk2
Copy link
Member

fengmk2 commented Jun 13, 2024

@elrrrrrrr ci 挂了

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.80%. Comparing base (038736d) to head (a5c8b2e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #699   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.80%   96.80%           
=======================================
  Files         181      181           
  Lines       18026    18030    +4     
  Branches     2341     2334    -7     
=======================================
+ Hits        17450    17454    +4     
  Misses        576      576           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts (1)

Line range hint 254-283: Optimize the handling of latestItem to reduce redundant calculations.

The implementation of latestItem to determine the most recent item is correct. However, consider refactoring the loop to avoid recalculating latestItem multiple times. You can calculate it once outside the loop and then reference it inside the loop as needed. This change would align with the PR's goal of reducing redundant calculations.

Additionally, the variable isLatestItem should be declared as const since it is not reassigned. This change was suggested by the static analysis tool and is still applicable here.

- let latestItem: BinaryItem | undefined;
- for (const item of fetchItems) {
-   if (!latestItem) {
-     latestItem = sortBy(fetchItems, ['date']).pop();
-   }
+ const latestItem = sortBy(fetchItems, ['date']).pop();
+ for (const item of fetchItems) {
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35ed350 and a5c8b2e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts (2 hunks)

@elrrrrrrr elrrrrrrr requested a review from fengmk2 June 13, 2024 15:12
@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 753e519 into master Jun 14, 2024
13 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the perf-diff branch June 14, 2024 01:41
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2024
[skip ci]

## [3.61.4](v3.61.3...v3.61.4) (2024-06-14)

### Bug Fixes

* perf diff ([#699](#699)) ([753e519](753e519)), closes [#698](#698)
@fengmk2
Copy link
Member

fengmk2 commented Jun 17, 2024

@elrrrrrrr 效果明显!
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

perf: diff
2 participants