Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing evaluate() to multidispatch.__call__() #130

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

s417-lama
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #129

multimethod/__init__.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (50d8ff8) to head (b64ae79).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #130   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines          285       285           
  Branches        53        53           
=========================================
  Hits           285       285           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 23, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #130 will not alter performance

Comparing s417-lama:fix-missing-evaluate (b64ae79) with main (50d8ff8)

Summary

✅ 4 untouched benchmarks

@coady coady merged commit db1bd7b into coady:main Jan 24, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pending types are not correctly handled at the first call in multidispatch
2 participants