XP Inc - Hackathon Submission [ONSITE] [94.85% Accuracy] #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Team
Craig Inglis
Joao Soares
Italo Dias
Kaitlyn Inglis
Company
XP Inc (Brazil-based investment bank)
Comments
We implemented a two-pass hierarchy. In the first step we generated multiple possible results, possibly by different models. Then, the second step servers as a challenger, receiving the results and acting as a tie-breaker.
Results
We achieved a high result with both the GptXpSolution and the MixedXpSolution, but no advances with the LlamaXpSolution. This indicates GPT has a high self-reflection index while LLama struggled more.
The following image shows the full results for a single trial run, where we got GptXpSolution up to 94.85% accuracy.