-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support list in conan command during version check #668
Open
oleksandr-prykhodko-quickbase
wants to merge
1
commit into
conan-io:develop2
Choose a base branch
from
oleksandr-prykhodko-quickbase:conan_command_as_list_to_conan_get_version
base: develop2
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not very clear. The
CONAN_COMMAND
variable is the one defined in the abovefind_program()
, not a custom defined one, but you said you defined it asset(CONAN_COMMAND "py;conan_command.py")
. Where did you defined it? And how it gets to this location with that value?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your script defines this variable at this point, but you don't own it—we can define it too! :)
At the beginning of
CMakeLists.txt
, we set up various configurations, including theCONAN_COMMAND
. Because of this setup,CONAN_COMMAND
is not being set by thefind_program()
call mentioned above (as described in the documentation: 'If the program is found, the result is stored in the variable, and the search will not be repeated unless the variable is cleared.').As a result, we define
CONAN_COMMAND
before any actual work is done, meaning that whenfind_program()
is invoked later, it effectively does nothing.The
conan_provider
is used as advised with-DCMAKE_PROJECT_TOP_LEVEL_INCLUDES=../conan_provider.cmake
. When CMake retrieves dependencies from Conan,conan_provide_dependency
is called. By this point, our pre-setup has already executed, andCONAN_COMMAND
has been set.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But that approach is a bit risky, isn't it? If there is some other Conan installed in the system, the
find_program()
will find it and use it, while your intention was to use your own wrapper always, is that correct?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, no sorry, you are right, if the
find_program()
finds that it is set, it will not even try to find it, reusing, it.Understood, thanks for the clarification!