Add tinycbor c++ library package

[sdebionne]

Checklist

• Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• Source is from official source.
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
• Build number is 0.
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/tinycbor) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/tinycbor:

• The recipe must have some tests.

[stale]

Hi friend!

We really, really, really appreciate that you have taken the time to make a PR on conda-forge/staged-recipes! conda-forge only exists because people like you donate their time to build and maintain conda recipes for use by the community.

In an effort to maintain this repository and increase the signal-to-noise for open PRs, the maintainers of staged-recipes close excessively old PRs after six months. This PR will remain open for another month, and then will be closed.

If you'd like to keep it open, please comment/push and we will be happy to oblige! Note that very old PRs will likely need to be rebased on main so that they can be rebuilt with the most recent CI scripts. If you have any trouble, or we missed reviewing this PR in the first place (sorry!), feel free to ping the team using a special command in a comment on the PR to get the attention of the staged-recipes team.

Cheers and thank you for contributing to this community effort!

[sdebionne]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/tinycbor) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/tinycbor) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/tinycbor:

• Selectors are suggested to take a <two spaces>#<one space>[<expression>] form. See lines [52, 57]

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/tinycbor) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/tinycbor:

• Selectors are suggested to take a <two spaces>#<one space>[<expression>] form. See lines [52, 58]

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/tinycbor) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[sdebionne]

@conda-forge/help-c-cpp, ready for review!

[sdebionne]

@conda-forge/help-c-cpp, ready for review!

[carterbox]

Please remove all the explainer comments if you're done with them. The comments are still available in the reference recipe.

[carterbox]

Have you opened a pull request to upstream this patch?

[sdebionne]

I have just opened intel/tinycbor#242

[carterbox]

Have you opened a PR to upstream this patch? Does this CMake build system generate artifacts that are named the same as the ones generated by makefiles? For example, sometimes the DLL name on windows might have/not have the lib prefix.

[sdebionne]

I am not sure the original build system supports Windows, I'll need to check.

[sdebionne]

Thank you for the thorough review (nice to get a review from a synchrotron colleague BTW). I applied the necessary changes.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/tinycbor) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/tinycbor:

• This recipe is using a compiler, which now requires adding a build dependence on {{ stdlib("c") }} as well. For further details, please see META: {{ stdlib("c") }} migration conda-forge.github.io#2102.

[carterbox]

Sorry about the wait. Somehow the review-requested tag wasn't added, so I haven't been seing this PR in the list.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/tinycbor) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[carterbox]

LGTM if build passes. Just be aware that if the custom CMake script if not ABI compatible with upstream's build scripts, you may get complaints from users about compatability with other conda channels. Compatability with other channels is not something we support, but it's good to have artifacts which match the canonical ones.