Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dymoval Version 0.9.0 #28398

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Dymoval Version 0.9.0 #28398

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

ubaldot
Copy link
Contributor

@ubaldot ubaldot commented Nov 28, 2024

Checklist

  • Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
  • License file is packaged (see here for an example).
  • Source is from official source.
  • Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
  • If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
  • Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
  • Build number is 0.
  • A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
  • GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
  • When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I was trying to look for recipes to lint for you, but it appears we have a merge conflict. Please try to merge or rebase with the base branch to resolve this conflict.

Please ping the 'conda-forge/core' team (using the @ notation in a comment) if you believe this is a bug.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Hi! This is the staged-recipes linter and I found some lint.

File-specific lints and/or hints:

  • recipes/dymoval/meta.yaml:
    • lints:
      • Feedstock with the same name exists in conda-forge.

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/dymoval/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/dymoval/meta.yaml:

  • ℹ️ noarch: python recipes should usually follow the syntax in our documentation for specifying the Python version.
    • For the host section of the recipe, you should usually use python {{ python_min }} for the python entry.
    • For the run section of the recipe, you should usually use python >={{ python_min }} for the python entry.
    • For the test.requires section of the recipe, you should usually use python {{ python_min }} for the python entry.
    • If the package requires a newer Python version than the currently supported minimum version on conda-forge, you can override the python_min variable by adding a Jinja2 set statement at the top of your recipe (or using an equivalent context variable for v1 recipes).
  • ℹ️ PyPI default URL is now pypi.org, and not pypi.io. You may want to update the default source url.

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/12075355571. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

conda-forge-admin commented Nov 28, 2024

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/dymoval/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/dymoval/meta.yaml:

  • ❌ Invalid noarch value python 9999. Should be one of python, generic.

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/12075470499. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

@ubaldot
Copy link
Contributor Author

ubaldot commented Nov 28, 2024

It looks like that this repo is for the new recipe, correct? The update version of my package will be distributed on conda automatically since I already released it on pipy, correct?

@ubaldot ubaldot closed this Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants