Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #5514

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #5514

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

beckermr
Copy link
Contributor

@beckermr beckermr commented Oct 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

This PR uses a more specific regex for jinja2 set statements per the comment from @isuruf.

Checklist - did you ...

  • Add a file to the news directory (using the template) for the next release's release notes?
  • Add / update necessary tests?
  • Add / update outdated documentation?

@conda-bot conda-bot added the cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA label Oct 23, 2024
@beckermr
Copy link
Contributor Author

pre-commit.ci autofix

isuruf
isuruf reviewed Oct 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
conda_build/variants.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
beckermr
beckermr commented Oct 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
conda_build/variants.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@beckermr beckermr changed the title fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set statements fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements Oct 23, 2024
@beckermr
Copy link
Contributor Author

pre-commit.ci autofix

@beckermr beckermr mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Merged
3 tasks
isuruf
isuruf previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
@beckermr beckermr marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 16:18
@beckermr beckermr requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 16:18
@beckermr beckermr enabled auto-merge (squash) October 23, 2024 16:19
@beckermr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for noticing and suggesting a fix @isuruf!

@codspeed-hq CodSpeed HQ
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5514 will not alter performance

Comparing beckermr-patch-1 (41e1fd8) with main (ebaf9ed)

Summary

✅ 5 untouched benchmarks

beckermr
beckermr commented Oct 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
tests/requirements-ci.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@beckermr
Copy link
Contributor Author

blocked by #5515

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@isuruf isuruf isuruf left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA
Projects
🔎 Review
Status: ✅ Approved
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@beckermr @isuruf @conda-bot