Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move to LazyLock #862

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

move to LazyLock #862

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

mythi
Copy link
Contributor

@mythi mythi commented Jan 2, 2025

No description provided.

mythi added 4 commits January 2, 2025 16:59
LazyLock has been part of the standard library since 1.80.x
and is already used by other dependencies in this repository.

Replace lazy_static macro with LazyLock.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Ylinen <[email protected]>
LazyLock has been part of the standard library since 1.80.x
and is already used by other dependencies in this repository.

Replace lazy_static macro with LazyLock.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Ylinen <[email protected]>
LazyLock has been part of the standard library since 1.80.x
and is already used by other dependencies in this repository.

Replace lazy_static macro with LazyLock.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Ylinen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mikko Ylinen <[email protected]>
@mythi mythi marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2025 15:49
@mythi mythi requested a review from a team as a code owner January 2, 2025 15:49
Copy link
Member

@fitzthum fitzthum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Are we officially tracking our msrv somewhere?

@Xynnn007
Copy link
Member

Xynnn007 commented Jan 3, 2025

@fitzthum nowhere as I know. Up to now only the GH workflow ci yamls have define the rust toolset versions but we do not have a place to publicly tell.

@Xynnn007 Xynnn007 merged commit aec7a2b into confidential-containers:main Jan 3, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants