Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

do-not-merge: Test kata-deploy #416

Conversation

fidencio
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@fidencio
Copy link
Member Author

This is uses a specific amd64 payload, so it shouldn't pass on s390x. However, it should pass everyone else if the kata-containers PRs fixes the issue.

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ images:
- name: quay.io/kata-containers/kata-deploy
newName: quay.io/kata-containers/kata-deploy-ci
# FIXME: Remove this once https://github.com/confidential-containers/operator/issues/391 is resolved
newTag: kata-containers-43dca8deb4891678f8a62c112749ac0938b373c6-amd64
newTag: kata-containers-1f6a8baaf187e38e9e6eae0f4a225f77cdefd3a6-amd64
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @fidencio !

Something is wrong. Shouldn't it be ghcr.io/kata-containers/kata-deploy-ci:10169-1f6a8baaf187e38e9e6eae0f4a225f77cdefd3a6-amd64 as published in https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/actions/runs/10405169709/job/28815750111?pr=10169 ?

quay.io/kata-containers/kata-deploy-ci:kata-containers-1f6a8baaf187e38e9e6eae0f4a225f77cdefd3a6-amd64 doesn't exist

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, you're correct.

@fidencio fidencio force-pushed the do-not-merge/test-kata-deploy branch from 62112d4 to ef581a7 Compare August 15, 2024 20:59
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <[email protected]>
@fidencio fidencio force-pushed the do-not-merge/test-kata-deploy branch from ef581a7 to 86f7309 Compare August 15, 2024 21:41
@fidencio fidencio closed this Aug 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants