Update dependency org.postgresql:postgresql to v42 [SECURITY] (master) #299
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For any questions/concerns about this PR, please review the Renovate Bot wiki/FAQs, or the #renovatebot Slack channel.
This PR contains the following updates:
9.4.1208.jre7
->42.2.28
Warning
Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.
pgjdbc Does Not Check Class Instantiation when providing Plugin Classes
BIT-postgresql-jdbc-driver-2022-21724 / CGA-63j7-vh89-wc5p / CVE-2022-21724 / GHSA-v7wg-cpwc-24m4
More information
Details
Impact
pgjdbc instantiates plugin instances based on class names provided via
authenticationPluginClassName
,sslhostnameverifier
,socketFactory
,sslfactory
,sslpasswordcallback
connection properties.However, the driver did not verify if the class implements the expected interface before instantiating the class.
Here's an example attack using an out-of-the-box class from Spring Framework:
The first impacted version is REL9.4.1208 (it introduced
socketFactory
connection property)Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver SQL Injection in ResultSet.refreshRow() with malicious column names
BIT-postgresql-jdbc-driver-2022-31197 / CGA-fqv6-m5xf-9wf3 / CVE-2022-31197 / GHSA-r38f-c4h4-hqq2
More information
Details
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
The PGJDBC implementation of the
java.sql.ResultRow.refreshRow()
method is not performing escaping of column names so a malicious column name that contains a statement terminator, e.g.;
, could lead to SQL injection. This could lead to executing additional SQL commands as the application's JDBC user.User applications that do not invoke the
ResultSet.refreshRow()
method are not impacted.User application that do invoke that method are impacted if the underlying database that they are querying via their JDBC application may be under the control of an attacker. The attack requires the attacker to trick the user into executing SQL against a table name who's column names would contain the malicious SQL and subsequently invoke the
refreshRow()
method on the ResultSet.For example:
This example has a table with two columns. The name of the second column is crafted to contain a statement terminator followed by additional SQL. Invoking the
ResultSet.refreshRow()
on a ResultSet that queried this table, e.g.SELECT * FROM refresh_row
, would cause the additional SQL commands such as theSELECT pg_sleep(10)
invocation to be executed.As the multi statement command would contain multiple results, it would not be possible for the attacker to get data directly out of this approach as the
ResultSet.refreshRow()
method would throw an exception. However, the attacker could execute any arbitrary SQL including inserting the data into another table that could then be read or any other DML / DDL statement.Note that the application's JDBC user and the schema owner need not be the same. A JDBC application that executes as a privileged user querying database schemas owned by potentially malicious less-privileged users would be vulnerable. In that situation it may be possible for the malicious user to craft a schema that causes the application to execute commands as the privileged user.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
Yes, versions 42.2.26, 42.3.7, and 42.4.1 have been released with a fix.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
Check that you are not using the
ResultSet.refreshRow()
method.If you are, ensure that the code that executes that method does not connect to a database that is controlled by an unauthenticated or malicious user. If your application only connects to its own database with a fixed schema with no DDL permissions, then you will not be affected by this vulnerability as it requires a maliciously crafted schema.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
org.postgresql:postgresql vulnerable to SQL Injection via line comment generation
BIT-postgresql-jdbc-driver-2024-1597 / CGA-5cmg-w6mr-wx73 / CGA-pp92-9wg6-xwgx / CVE-2024-1597 / GHSA-24rp-q3w6-vc56 / GHSA-xfg6-62px-cxc2
More information
Details
Impact
SQL injection is possible when using the non-default connection property
preferQueryMode=simple
in combination with application code that has a vulnerable SQL that negates a parameter value.There is no vulnerability in the driver when using the default query mode. Users that do not override the query mode are not impacted.
Exploitation
To exploit this behavior the following conditions must be met:
-
)The prior behavior of the driver when operating in simple query mode would inline the negative value of the first parameter and cause the resulting line to be treated as a
--
SQL comment. That would extend to the beginning of the next parameter and cause the quoting of that parameter to be consumed by the comment line. If that string parameter includes a newline, the resulting text would appear unescaped in the resulting SQL.When operating in the default extended query mode this would not be an issue as the parameter values are sent separately to the server. Only in simple query mode the parameter values are inlined into the executed SQL causing this issue.
Example
The resulting SQL when operating in simple query mode would be:
The contents of the second parameter get injected into the command. Note how both the number of result columns and the WHERE clause of the command have changed. A more elaborate example could execute arbitrary other SQL commands.
Patch
Problem will be patched upgrade to 42.7.2, 42.6.1, 42.5.5, 42.4.4, 42.3.9, 42.2.28, 42.2.28.jre7
The patch fixes the inlining of parameters by forcing them all to be serialized as wrapped literals. The SQL in the prior example would be transformed into:
Workarounds
Do not use the connection property
preferQueryMode=simple
. (NOTE: If you do not explicitly specify a query mode then you are using the default ofextended
and are not impacted by this issue.)Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.