Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Build error #78

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mviswanathsai
Copy link
Contributor

@mviswanathsai mviswanathsai commented Feb 12, 2025

The error is still prevalent, but the test case itself has been refactored.
The source of the e2e test failing is that dagger is not authenticated with docker and docker rate limits dagger from pulling images due to this.

Options:

  1. What we can do is, use our own private registry with credentials/ docker account with credentials for testing purposes if we have any. We can configure the test environment with github secret and make use of the credentials as normal env variables.
  2. We may need to temporarily remove the test case and keep the issue open until we find a way to authenticate our dagger service.
  3. I tried pulling images from other services (amazon, for example) without authentication but they all require some form of authorization for pulling. We could create a dummy account for this purpose and try if it works.

Need some help here. @Mehul-Kumar-27 @Vad1mo @bupd

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Consolidated configuration handling by unifying the test configuration file path and removing redundant initialization logic.
  • Tests

    • Streamlined the test setup by eliminating unnecessary registry setup steps and simplifying image push validations.
    • Enhanced error handling in tests to improve clarity when processing image data.
  • Refactor

    • Improved internal code clarity by adding descriptive comments to outline future enhancements for image verification.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Walkthrough

This PR introduces a placeholder comment in the replicator module to indicate where image existence should be verified. It also simplifies test configuration by removing redundant constants and initialization logic, replacing them with a consolidated constant in the end-to-end tests. Moreover, the satellite test functions are refactored to remove registry setup steps, update image source handling to a public ECR, and adjust function signatures for improved error management.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
internal/.../replicator.go Added a comment (// check if image already exists in zot registry/ local registry) in the Replicate method of the BasicReplicator struct as a placeholder for future image existence checks.
test/e2e/config.go, test/e2e/satellite_test.go Removed redundant constants (relative_path, absolute_path) and the init function in config; updated satellite tests by eliminating registry setup, revising image push logic to use public ECR, and adjusting function signatures for error handling.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as Test Runner
    participant BS as buildSatellite()
    participant P as pushImageToSourceRegistry()
    participant E as Public ECR Repo

    T->>BS: Invoke buildSatellite()
    BS->>BS: Compute config path with filepath.Abs
    BS-->>T: Return configuration path
    T->>P: Call pushImageToSourceRegistry()
    P->>E: Push image to public ECR repository
    E-->>P: Return result/error
    P-->>T: Return error if encountered
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

golang

Suggested reviewers

  • Vad1mo

Poem

I hop through lines of code with glee,
A little comment now points where to be.
Configs streamlined, tests set anew,
With tweaks and checks all shining through.
This rabbit rhymes in ASCII delight,
Celebrating our changes day and night! 🐰

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
test/e2e/satellite_test.go (4)

29-56: Consider removing unused registry setup functions.

Since the registry setup is no longer used in TestSatellite, these functions can be safely removed to maintain code cleanliness.


72-83: Enhance error handling and image configuration.

While using a public ECR repository is a good solution for the rate limiting issue, consider these improvements:

  1. The error handling could be more specific than checking for "ERROR" in stdout.
  2. The image tag could be made configurable through a constant.

Apply this diff:

+const (
+	publicImage = "public.ecr.aws/docker/library/busybox"
+	imageTag    = "1.36"
+)

-		WithExec([]string{"crane", "copy", "public.ecr.aws/docker/library/busybox:1.36", "source:5000/library/busybox:1.36", "--insecure"}).
+		WithExec([]string{"crane", "copy", fmt.Sprintf("%s:%s", publicImage, imageTag), fmt.Sprintf("source:5000/library/busybox:%s", imageTag), "--insecure"}).

-	if strings.Contains(stdOut, "ERROR") {
+	if err != nil {
+		return fmt.Errorf("failed to push image: %w", err)
+	}
+	if strings.Contains(stdOut, "ERROR") {
+		return fmt.Errorf("error in output: %s", stdOut)
+	}

98-100: Remove debug prints or use proper logging.

Consider removing the debug prints or replacing them with proper logging.

Apply this diff:

	config, err := filepath.Abs(filepath.Join(parentDir, test_config_path))
-	fmt.Println("the new config path: ", config)
+	// Use proper logging if needed
+	// log.Printf("Config path: %s", config)

121-124: Remove debug prints or use proper logging.

Consider removing the debug prints or replacing them with proper logging.

Apply this diff:

-	fmt.Println("The following is the stdout of the satellite: ")
-	fmt.Println()
-	fmt.Print(output)
-	fmt.Println()
+	// Use proper logging if needed
+	// log.Printf("Satellite output: %s", output)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e893457 and 0c2462e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • internal/state/replicator.go (1 hunks)
  • test/e2e/config.go (1 hunks)
  • test/e2e/satellite_test.go (5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • internal/state/replicator.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/e2e/satellite_test.go (1)

26-26: LGTM! Simplified test setup.

The removal of registry setup parameters aligns with the PR objectives by eliminating Docker authentication issues.

const (
appDir = "/app"
appBinary = "app"
sourceFile = "main.go"
relative_path = "./testdata/config.json"
absolute_path = "test/e2e/testdata/config.json"
test_config_path = "/test/e2e/testdata/config.json"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve constant naming and path handling.

  1. Use camelCase naming convention to follow Go standards.
  2. Consider using a relative path for better portability.

Apply this diff:

-	test_config_path           = "/test/e2e/testdata/config.json"
+	testConfigPath            = "testdata/config.json"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test_config_path = "/test/e2e/testdata/config.json"
testConfigPath = "testdata/config.json"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant