-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: add centos stream 10 rpm build and e2e test #743
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Wang <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks sane, though one issue is the matrix here is getting pretty large, and fairly often we hit "artemis" provisioning failures e.g.
Workaround issue https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-46893 Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Wang <[email protected]>
"systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=0" does not work with CS10 It caused boot failure with error: [!!!!!!] Refusing to run under cgroup v1, SY… specified on kernel command line. Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Wang <[email protected]>
SOURCE can be overlay, none or composefs Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Wang <[email protected]>
Hi @lukewarmtemp, I found I have to remove it in this PR because it caused boot failure on CS10 with error: I there any test impact of remove this karg? Thanks. |
You're free to remove it. Sorry, I just arbitrarily chose some kargs to test and didn't realize that it might conflict with others. |
Yes, we should definitely not set that. |
Yes. The most of time (99%) the provisioning issue happens on x86_64 runner machine. Looks the aarch64 runner does not hit the quota.
|
Release 0.2.24
This PR includes: