Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: set a default policy group name #1094

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

chrisplo
Copy link
Contributor

@chrisplo chrisplo commented Dec 1, 2017

Pods that did not specify a contiv group will be
assigned a default based on a name pattern:

"ns-" + + "-default"

@chrisplo
Copy link
Contributor Author

chrisplo commented Dec 1, 2017

build PR

1 similar comment
@chrisplo
Copy link
Contributor Author

chrisplo commented Dec 2, 2017

build PR

@dseevr
Copy link
Contributor

dseevr commented Dec 3, 2017

build pr

rchirakk and others added 3 commits December 5, 2017 16:31
k8s-test: first_master_make_targets:=run-build
k8s-test: export VAGRANT_CWD:=$(PWD)/vagrant/k8s
k8s-test: export CONTIV_K8S_USE_KUBEADM:=1 CONTIV_NODES:=3 PYTHONIOENCODING:=utf-8
k8s-test: k8s-cluster make-on-first-master-dep
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will these duplicate targets be combined into a single k8s-test?

// Pods need to be in a group to allow policies to be applied after pod
// creation, if a group is not specified by the user, then place pod
// into a group shared across the pod's namespace, as contiv group is part
// of a network and network is in a k8s namespace
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add the above four lines in the description of this PR so that reviewers know what it does. Also, curious to know if this approach decreased the runtime of system tests? If so, by how much?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants