-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add solar.py back to TESTS #34
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This reverts commit 61c1500.
retest this please |
That's interesting that some machines are not robust enough to handle it |
@galbramc, analysis of this issue has moved to this thread |
What has moved here? |
Oh, discussion from convexengineering/gpkit#1306 Is it macys_VM, reynolds, and windows7x64 that have MOSEK 7? The new QPROP model in |
Yeah those are the machines with mosek 7. Can you download 7 and give it a try on your machine? Do they still support 7? |
it's still available for download but does not seem to be actively supported |
Your call then if you support 7... |
Don't forget that some people deal with locked down systems. Working with government agencies in particular have lots or restrictions on what they can put on their computer, and upgrading for 7 to 8 may be non-trivial. |
test this please |
@galbramc after thinking about it, and encountering another MOSEK 7/8 difference on #1315, I think we want to have MOSEK 8 on all machines. When that's done solar.py should be able to pass tests on those three machines again and we should be able to merge this. |
test this please |
@mjburton11 there appears to be a bug on this branch? it's not passing on any of the machines. |
Can you do anything in your build script to check that people are only using mosek 8 or newer in that case? I don't know when 9 will come out, but I'm sure it will some day. |
I'm going to wait until the bug on this branch is fixed to double confirm that you want the switch to mosek 8 on all machines. |
Reverts #33
@mjburton11 It only fails on the
Npods=5
solve on those machines, so in hindsight I could have commented that out instead of removing the whole file from TESTS.