Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 2024.2 #4793

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024
Merged

Release 2024.2 #4793

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

jmarrero
Copy link
Member

@jmarrero jmarrero commented Jan 24, 2024

v2024.2

Release 2024.2

Notable bug fixes are:

Colin Walters (1):
      daemon: Add a bit more error prefixing

HuijingHei (1):
      test-misc-2.sh: update checking log

Jonathan Lebon (9):
      core: Don't touch /usr/local at assembly time
      app: Tweak tmpfiles.d integration entries for `/usr/local`
      app: Split out /var/{opt,usrlocal} tmpfiles.d entries in separate dropin
      ci/prow: temporarily stop composing with new rpm-ostree
      rust/lockfile: Drop unused imports
      libpriv: Stop digging in private libcap internals
      .github: add new issue template

Joseph Marrero (2):
      Update ostree-ext to 0.12.9
      Release 2024.2


Timothée Ravier (1):
      Cargo.toml: Exclude idna/tests for vendor tarball

Full Changelog: v2024.1...v2024.2

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Jan 24, 2024

I'm working on adding tests to #4728 now that we have a new ostree. Hoping to be able to get that into this release!

@jmarrero
Copy link
Member Author

I'm working on adding tests to #4728 now that we have a new ostree. Hoping to be able to get that into this release!

np, I need to update some code to follow the changes on ostree-ext to get this in. But it's related to a blocker issue. So I'll keep you informed.

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Jan 24, 2024

#4728 is updated now! If we can't get it reviewed and merged in time, that's OK.

@cgwalters cgwalters merged commit ec6b2e0 into coreos:main Jan 24, 2024
17 checks passed
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

#4728 is updated now! If we can't get it reviewed and merged in time, that's OK.

Let's aim to do another release in a week

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants