feat: x/precisebank module

[dudong2]

Description

TL;DR: Introduces x/precisebank to address EVM ↔ SDK precision mismatch and integrates it with x/vm and precompiles.

---

Problem

• Cosmos SDK assumes a 6-decimal denomination across all modules.
• EVM uses 18 decimals, causing precision loss when transferring values or paying gas.
• Sub-6-decimal values are floored, which can lead to:
  • Loss of small token amounts
  • Arbitrage vulnerabilities in DEXs like Uniswap v2 navite coin -> erc20 senarios due to mismatched balance handling

---

Purpose

• Enable precise handling of fractional balances in EVM-related modules.
• Preserve and manage sub-integer values (e.g., 0.0000001 (= 10^-7) tokens) without loss.
• Seamlessly integrate precise value tracking into x/vm and precompiles.

---

Implemented Changes

• Introduced a new x/precisebank module based on Kava’s implementation.
• Generalized to support 1~18 decimal assets, not just 6↔18.
• Added carry/borrow mechanics for converting fractional to integer coins.
• Replaced direct use of BankKeeper with PreciseBankKeeper in:
  • x/vm
  • precompiles
• Added invariant check for total supply
• Added CLI queries for fractional balances and remainder state.
• Added tests:
  • Edge case handling
  • Fuzz tests (Mint, Burn, Send, Genesis validation)
  • Random value tests
  • Contract tests(simple wrap/unwarp)

---

Notes

• For tokens with exactly 18 decimals, using x/precisebank is supported but not necessary — the standard x/bank module is sufficient and recommended.
• The x/precisebank module is designed to manage only the fractional (sub-integer) balances, while integer balances continue to be managed by the x/bank module..
• Staking, slashing, distribution, and other Cosmos SDK modules remain unchanged:
  • They all assume 6 decimals and are out of scope for this PR.

Closes: #48

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• tackled an existing issue or discussed with a team member
• left instructions on how to review the changes
• targeted the main branch

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required.
Please add a note if the item is not applicable
and please add your handle next to the items reviewed
if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• confirmed that this PR does not change production code
• reviewed content
• tested instructions (if applicable)
• confirmed all CI checks have passed