Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: Add BlocksUntilNextEpoch query #2106
feat!: Add BlocksUntilNextEpoch query #2106
Changes from all commits
e47e04a
56c9bf3
99a64c7
b9e8cf3
88854c8
062dad6
36565c9
27774e1
c60d606
23cf6bf
cdef43d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Surround fenced code block with blank lines.
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
+ ```bash interchain-security-pd query provider blocks-until-next-epoch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@p-offtermatt Is it expected that coderabbitai still looks at markdown files?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was branched off of main before the config change got in, so on this PR, yes it is
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling for null responses.
The function should handle potential null responses to prevent unexpected errors.
Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling for null requests.
The function should handle potential null requests to prevent unexpected errors.
Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems you could easily move the logic inside the query itself without having to create the
BlocksUntilNextEpoch
method. Was this added to make testing easier? Couldn't we test the logic from insidegrpc_query_test.go
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To make tests easier and to make the query logic and the logic in relay.go more closely connected with the query. I dont see a downside, do you think this is worse now?