-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix!: handle some panics #2205
fix!: handle some panics #2205
Conversation
@@ -104,8 +111,8 @@ func (k Keeper) ProviderValidatorUpdates(ctx sdk.Context) []abci.ValidatorUpdate | |||
for _, val := range bondedValidators[:maxValidators] { | |||
nextValidator, err := k.CreateProviderConsensusValidator(ctx, val) | |||
if err != nil { | |||
k.Logger(ctx).Error("error when creating provider consensus validator", "error", err, "validator", val) | |||
continue | |||
return []abci.ValidatorUpdate{}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this returning an error now instead of simply logging? We want this to fail as a whole if we fail to create a single validator?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think so. Why would we fail to create a validator. If that happens, that's for sure something wrong with the state, right?
@@ -68,11 +68,14 @@ func TestQueueVSCPackets(t *testing.T) { | |||
mocks := testkeeper.NewMockedKeepers(ctrl) | |||
testkeeper.SetupMocksForLastBondedValidatorsExpectation(mocks.MockStakingKeeper, 0, []stakingtypes.Validator{}, 1) | |||
|
|||
mocks.MockStakingKeeper.EXPECT().GetBondedValidatorsByPower(gomock.Any()).Return([]stakingtypes.Validator{}, nil).AnyTimes() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this indented correctly? Looks like it's fully on the left in comparison to the others.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also fine for me, but gets confusing/wrong when I scale down the browser window
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, beside the logic change in ProviderValidatorUpdates
which would cause a halt instead of accepting this situation with a log I'm fine in general.
maybe worth to crosscheck with Philip if I miss an accepted corner case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks ok to me, I only had a brief look though. I don't think the error instead of log really makes a difference
Description
Closes: #XXXX
getTotalPower
EndBlockVSU
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if the change is state-machine breakingCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
the type prefix if the change is state-machine breaking