Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix slice init length #2370

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

wangjingcun
Copy link

Description

The intention here should be to initialize a slice with a capacity of len(byzantineValidators) rather than initializing the length of this slice.

The online demo: https://go.dev/play/p/q1BcVCmvidW


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • Included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Added ! to the type prefix if the change is state-machine breaking
  • Confirmed this PR does not introduce changes requiring state migrations, OR migration code has been added to consumer and/or provider modules
  • Targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • Provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • Followed the guidelines for building SDK modules
  • Included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • Added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • Included comments for documenting Go code
  • Updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • Reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • Confirmed all CI checks have passed
  • If this PR is library API breaking, bump the go.mod version string of the repo, and follow through on a new major release

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! the type prefix if the change is state-machine breaking
  • confirmed this PR does not introduce changes requiring state migrations, OR confirmed migration code has been added to consumer and/or provider modules
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage

@wangjingcun wangjingcun requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2024 14:46
@github-actions github-actions bot added the C:x/provider Assigned automatically by the PR labeler label Oct 24, 2024
@insumity
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks. This is already fixed here.

@wangjingcun
Copy link
Author

Thanks. This is already fixed here.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:x/provider Assigned automatically by the PR labeler
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants