refactor: grpc insecure plus plugin not mandatory #158
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the Rosetta project by allowing it to function without requiring a plugin. The implementation modifies the logic for loading plugins and establishing gRPC connections, introducing conditional checks for secure and insecure connections. Additionally, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
JulianToledano
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
cmd/rosetta.go (1)
32-44: LGTM! The changes align well with the PR objectives.The modifications successfully make the plugin optional and add support for gRPC reflection, improving Rosetta's flexibility. The code is well-structured and maintains consistency with the existing style.
A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider consolidating the error handling for both plugin loading and gRPC reflection to reduce code duplication. For example:
if pluginPath != "" { - err = rosetta.LoadPlugin(ir, pluginPath) - if err != nil { - fmt.Printf("[Rosetta]- Error while loading plugin: %s", err.Error()) - return err - } + err = rosetta.LoadPlugin(ir, pluginPath) } else if typesServer != "" { - err = rosetta.ReflectInterfaces(ir, typesServer) - if err != nil { - fmt.Printf("[Rosetta]- Error while reflecting from gRPC server: %s", err.Error()) - return err - } + err = rosetta.ReflectInterfaces(ir, typesServer) +} +if err != nil { + fmt.Printf("[Rosetta]- Error: %s", err.Error()) + return err }This change would make the code more DRY and easier to maintain.
CHANGELOG.md (2)
41-41: LGTM! Minor PR number discrepancy noted.The changelog entry accurately reflects the improvement mentioned in the PR objectives, allowing Rosetta to operate without requiring a plugin. This enhances flexibility and simplifies setup for users.
There's a small discrepancy in the PR number. The changelog references #157, while the PR objectives mention #158. Please verify and update the correct PR number if necessary.
45-45: LGTM! Consider rewording for clarity.The changelog entry correctly addresses the second objective mentioned in the PR summary, adding support for insecure connections to gRPC reflection servers.
To improve clarity, consider rewording the entry slightly:
- * [#157](https://github.com/cosmos/rosetta/pull/157) Added support for insecure connections to gRPC reflection servers. + * [#157](https://github.com/cosmos/rosetta/pull/157) Added support for optional insecure connections to gRPC reflection servers.This change emphasizes that insecure connections are an optional feature, aligning more closely with the PR objectives.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- cmd/rosetta.go (1 hunks)
- config.go (1 hunks)
- load.go (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
cmd/rosetta.go (2)
32-44: Summary: Excellent implementation of optional plugin and gRPC reflection support.The changes successfully implement the PR objectives:
- Making the plugin optional
- Adding support for gRPC reflection
The new code is well-structured, maintains consistency with the existing codebase, and provides improved flexibility for Rosetta users. The error handling is consistent, and the changes are backwards-compatible.
These changes significantly enhance Rosetta's usability and adaptability. Great job!
32-33: Verify the new flags are properly defined and documented.The introduction of
pluginPathandtypesServersuggests new command-line flags. Let's ensure these are properly defined and documented in therosettapackage.Please ensure that the new flags are properly defined, documented, and explained in the relevant documentation.
CHANGELOG.md (1)
39-46: Changelog updates accurately reflect PR objectives. Please verify PR number.The new entries in the changelog effectively capture the key changes introduced in this PR:
- Allowing Rosetta to run without requiring a plugin (Improvement).
- Adding support for insecure connections to gRPC reflection servers (Bug Fix).
These updates align well with the PR objectives and provide clear information for users about the changes.
Please verify the correct PR number (157 or 158) and update it consistently in both changelog entries if necessary. Run the following script to check the PR number in the repository:
load.go (3)
178-178: Approve the simplification of name variable creationThe use of
strings.ReplaceAllto create thenamevariable is a good simplification. It improves code readability without changing the functionality.
Line range hint
1-181: Verify alignment with PR objectivesThe changes successfully implement support for insecure gRPC connections. However, the PR summary also mentioned making the plugin optional, which is not reflected in the changes to this file.
Please clarify if the plugin-related changes are implemented in other files or if this objective has been deferred. If it's implemented elsewhere, consider updating the PR description to accurately reflect the scope of changes in this file.
To verify if plugin-related changes exist in other files:
#!/bin/bash # Search for plugin-related changes rg --type go 'plugin' -C 5
47-53: Approve changes with security considerationsThe implementation now supports both secure (TLS) and insecure connections based on the endpoint scheme, which aligns with the PR objective. The use of TLS 1.2 as the minimum version for HTTPS endpoints is a good security practice.
However, please ensure that the use of insecure credentials is properly documented and that users are aware of the security implications. Consider adding a warning log when insecure credentials are used.
To verify the usage of credentials:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of insecure and secure credentials rg --type go 'insecure\.NewCredentials\(\)|credentials\.NewTLS\(' -C 5Also applies to: 55-55
config.go (2)
307-307: LGTM: Change aligns with PR objectives.The modification to set the default value of
FlagPluginto an empty string effectively makes the plugin optional. This change is consistent with the PR objective of allowing Rosetta to operate without the necessity of a plugin, thereby enhancing flexibility and simplifying setup for users who don't require plugin functionality.
307-307: Verify impact of optional plugin on the codebase.While this change correctly makes the plugin optional, it may have implications for other parts of the codebase:
- Ensure that any code relying on the plugin's presence has been updated to handle cases where no plugin is specified.
- Update documentation to reflect that the plugin is now optional.
- Consider adding appropriate error handling or conditional logic elsewhere in the codebase to account for cases where no plugin is specified.
To help verify the impact, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify areas of the codebase that might need attention due to the plugin becoming optional.
✅ Verification successful
Impact of making the plugin optional has been successfully verified.
- The
FlagPluginis correctly set to an empty default, making the plugin optional.- Appropriate error handling is implemented to manage scenarios where the plugin is absent or fails to load.
- Documentation has been updated to inform users that the plugin is now optional.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential areas affected by the plugin becoming optional # Search for usages of the plugin flag echo "Searching for usages of FlagPlugin:" rg --type go "FlagPlugin" # Search for potential error handling related to plugin echo "\nSearching for potential error handling related to plugin:" rg --type go -i "plugin.*error" # Search for documentation mentioning plugin echo "\nSearching for documentation mentioning plugin:" rg --type md -i "plugin"Length of output: 2169
| @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ import ( | |||
|
|
|||
| "google.golang.org/grpc" | |||
| "google.golang.org/grpc/credentials" | |||
| "google.golang.org/grpc/credentials/insecure" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Security Concern: Unconditional Use of Insecure gRPC Credentials
- In
client_online.go, theBootstrapmethod usesinsecure.NewCredentials()without conditional checks, which may lead to security vulnerabilities.
Please review and ensure that insecure credentials are only used in appropriate environments or implement conditional logic to enforce secure connections where necessary.
🔗 Analysis chain
Be cautious when using insecure credentials
The addition of the insecure package import aligns with the PR objective of supporting insecure gRPC connections. However, it's crucial to ensure that this is used judiciously and only in appropriate environments.
To verify the usage of insecure credentials:
Please ensure that proper warnings and documentation are in place to prevent accidental use in production environments where security is critical.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of insecure credentials
rg --type go 'insecure\.NewCredentials\(\)' -C 5
Length of output: 1364
This PR enables:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores