Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update batch-auctions.md #301

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update batch-auctions.md #301

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

gogonimago
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Changes

  • ...
  • ...

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 16, 2024 3:23am

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2024

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

Copy link
Contributor

@mfw78 mfw78 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quotes should be ", not /

Copy link
Contributor

@mfw78 mfw78 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please have all quotes as "

docs/cow-protocol/concepts/introduction/batch-auctions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -3,9 +3,10 @@ sidebar_position: 3
---

# Batch auctions
Continuous limit order book designs leave room for arbitrage, incentivizing high-frequency trading and resulting in sub-optimal pricing for traders. Batch auctions are a new type of trading mechanism which addresses these flaws by grouping orders into discrete time intervals. This approach eliminates the arbitrage opportunities inherent in continuous limit order book designs and delivers more beneficial outcomes for traders.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if this is quite true. Perhaps @acanidio-econ / @harisang could weigh in if this is structurally correct?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Took 3 months.... Makes sense to me, but let's wait for @acanidio-econ to confirm.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants