Skip to content

Issues: cplusplus/draft

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

654 Open 2,358 Closed
654 Open 2,358 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

[inplace.vector.modifiers] Revert wording for the Returns of try_append_range?
#7486 opened Dec 16, 2024 by hewillk
1
Clarifications in [dcl.spec.auto.general]
#7453 opened Nov 27, 2024 by mrussoLuxoft
2
[C++29] Dissolve [lex] into the rest of the standard
#7441 opened Nov 25, 2024 by AlisdairM
[vector.capacity] vector::reserve is tutorial-like
#7401 opened Nov 20, 2024 by jwakely
[C++29] Introduce a higher level of organization to [lex]
#7400 opened Nov 20, 2024 by AlisdairM
Main plan for clause reorganization for C++29
#7399 opened Nov 19, 2024 by tkoeppe C++29
@tkoeppe
[dcl.fct.def.coroutine]: Initialization of the copy of a parameter of a coroutine
#7383 opened Nov 12, 2024 by RazvanAM
2
Is suspended a term of power for coroutines?
#7377 opened Nov 7, 2024 by AlisdairM
Incorrect example for member access expression with using enum in [enum.udecl] CWG2959 cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.
#7368 opened Nov 4, 2024 by keinflue
4
Prepare C++26 for clause reorganization in C++29
#7352 opened Oct 24, 2024 by AlisdairM
[temp.spec.partial.general], [temp.expl.spec] "Partial specialization" and "explicit specialization" should be defined
#7349 opened Oct 24, 2024 by Eisenwave
1
[exec.util.cmplsig.trans] transform_completion_signatures_of is not further elaborated on
#7318 opened Oct 18, 2024 by jiixyj
1
[C++29][except] Dissolve the exceptions clause into the rest of the document
#7317 opened Oct 17, 2024 by AlisdairM
7
[intro.memory] Implication of the note for implementation-managed "memory locations"
#7303 opened Oct 14, 2024 by frederick-vs-ja
2
[cmplx.over] Should we reorder the paragraphs?
#7273 opened Sep 30, 2024 by frederick-vs-ja
[complex.numbers.general] Is the effect of instantiating complex<NonFP> unspecified even if the specialization is program-defined?
#7270 opened Sep 28, 2024 by frederick-vs-ja
1
5
[basic.stc.dynamic.general], [func.wrap.func], [any.class.general] "Dynamically allocated" is not defined
#7261 opened Sep 19, 2024 by Eisenwave
1
3
Integral promotion of enums should go all the way
#7257 opened Sep 16, 2024 by t3nsor
Is it proper to always use std:: on C functions mentioned in examples?
#7250 opened Sep 8, 2024 by Myriachan
2
"valarray<complex>"
#7235 opened Aug 19, 2024 by jwakely
2
[exec] Cast the return value of the comma expression to void? lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG.
#7222 opened Aug 14, 2024 by hewillk
3
[linalg] specification glitches
#7214 opened Aug 11, 2024 by mhoemmen
[stmt.for] Missing curly brackets in for-statement translation
#7211 opened Aug 10, 2024 by Eelis
1
[range.adaptor.object][exec.adapt.obj] Consider specifying piping only once
#7205 opened Aug 8, 2024 by frederick-vs-ja
[std.manip, ext.manip] Better titles for "Standard"/"Extended" manipulators
#7198 opened Aug 2, 2024 by frederick-vs-ja
2
ProTip! Updated in the last three days: updated:>2024-12-16.