Init View Filters #159
Init View Filters #159
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new TRPC router for managing target view metadata groups, featuring procedures for listing, retrieving, creating, updating, and deleting metadata groups. New database tables and schemas are added to support these functionalities, along with updates to the permission system to include specific permissions for managing metadata groups. Additionally, modifications to the database schema accommodate these changes while preserving existing functionalities. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant TRPCRouter
participant Database
Client->>TRPCRouter: Call create(groupData)
TRPCRouter->>Database: Insert new metadata group
Database-->>TRPCRouter: Confirmation of creation
TRPCRouter-->>Client: Return created group
Client->>TRPCRouter: Call update(groupId, updatedData)
TRPCRouter->>Database: Update metadata group
Database-->>TRPCRouter: Confirmation of update
TRPCRouter-->>Client: Return updated group
Client->>TRPCRouter: Call delete(groupId)
TRPCRouter->>Database: Delete metadata group
Database-->>TRPCRouter: Confirmation of deletion
TRPCRouter-->>Client: Return success message
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
packages/db/drizzle/0018_lowly_otto_octavius.sql (2)
1-5: LGTM! Consider adding an index on the view_id column.The table structure for "target_view_metadata_group" looks good. The use of UUID for the id column and NOT NULL constraints on view_id and name ensure data integrity.
Consider adding an index on the view_id column to improve query performance when filtering or joining on this column:
CREATE INDEX idx_target_view_metadata_group_view_id ON target_view_metadata_group(view_id);
7-11: LGTM! Consider adding a unique constraint on (group_id, key).The table structure for "target_view_metadata_group_key" looks good. The use of UUID for the id column and NOT NULL constraints on group_id and key ensure data integrity.
Consider adding a unique constraint on the combination of group_id and key to prevent duplicate keys within the same group:
ALTER TABLE target_view_metadata_group_key ADD CONSTRAINT unique_group_key UNIQUE (group_id, key);packages/db/drizzle/meta/_journal.json (1)
131-136: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment for the migration.The new entry is correctly structured and consistent with previous entries. It accurately reflects the addition of new SQL tables and functionalities for managing target view metadata groups.
To improve documentation, consider adding a brief comment in the migration file (
0018_lowly_otto_octavius.sql) describing the purpose of this migration, such as:-- Migration: Add tables and functionalities for target view metadata groupsThis will make it easier for developers to understand the purpose of each migration at a glance.
packages/validators/src/auth/index.ts (1)
65-70: LGTM! Consider minor adjustment for consistency.The new permissions for target view metadata group operations are well-structured and align with the existing permission scheme. They provide granular control over the new functionality, which is excellent for security and access management.
For consistency with other permission groups, consider moving these new permissions next to the existing
TargetViewpermissions (around line 40). This would improve readability and make it easier to manage related permissions.packages/api/src/router/target-view-metadata-group.ts (1)
156-156: Improve error handling increateprocedureThe error thrown when group creation fails is a generic
"Group creation failed". To aid in debugging and provide more context, consider using a more descriptive error message or a custom error class.For example:
if (!group) throw new Error("Group creation failed"); +// Consider providing additional details or using a custom error classpackages/db/src/schema/target.ts (1)
151-157: Consider movingTargetMetadatatype definition closer totargetMetadatatable definition for consistency.For better maintainability and readability, it's recommended to define the
TargetMetadatatype immediately after thetargetMetadatatable definition, as done with other schemas in this file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- packages/api/src/router/target-view-metadata-group.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/db/drizzle/0018_lowly_otto_octavius.sql (1 hunks)
- packages/db/drizzle/meta/_journal.json (1 hunks)
- packages/db/src/schema/target.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/validators/src/auth/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/db/drizzle/0018_lowly_otto_octavius.sql (3)
13-17: LGTM! Foreign key constraint looks good.The foreign key constraint for the "target_view_metadata_group" table is well-implemented. The use of a DO block with exception handling prevents errors if the constraint already exists. The cascade on delete and no action on update are appropriate for maintaining referential integrity.
19-23: LGTM! Foreign key constraint is well-implemented.The foreign key constraint for the "target_view_metadata_group_key" table is correctly implemented. The use of a DO block with exception handling is consistent with the previous constraint. The cascade on delete and no action on update maintain referential integrity between the metadata group and its keys.
1-23: Overall, excellent migration script with room for minor enhancements.This migration script creates a solid foundation for managing target view metadata groups and their associated keys. The table structures, primary keys, and foreign key constraints are well-implemented, ensuring data integrity.
To further improve the migration, consider the following suggestions:
- Add an index on the
view_idcolumn in thetarget_view_metadata_grouptable.- Add a unique constraint on the combination of
group_idandkeyin thetarget_view_metadata_group_keytable.These enhancements will improve query performance and prevent data duplication, respectively.
packages/validators/src/auth/index.ts (1)
65-70: Verify usage of new permissions across the application.The new permissions have been correctly added and will be automatically included in the predefined roles. However, it's important to ensure that these permissions are properly utilized in other parts of the application, such as the TRPC router mentioned in the PR summary.
Please run the following script to verify the usage of the new permissions:
This will help confirm that the new permissions are being correctly applied in the authorization checks for the relevant operations.
✅ Verification successful
New permissions are properly utilized in the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new target view metadata group permissions across the application. # Test: Search for the usage of new permissions in TRPC routers and other relevant files. rg -i "TargetViewMetadataGroup(List|Get|Create|Update|Delete)"Length of output: 1154
packages/api/src/router/target-view-metadata-group.ts (1)
224-225:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure cascading deletes for associated keys in
deleteprocedureWhen deleting a
targetViewMetadataGroup, associated keys intargetViewMetadataGroupKeymay remain in the database, leading to orphaned records. Ensure that the database schema has cascading delete or that the code explicitly deletes associated keys.Run the following script to check for foreign key constraints with cascading deletes:
✅ Verification successful
Cascading Deletes Verified
The
ON DELETE CASCADEconstraint is correctly implemented inpackages/db/src/schema/target.ts, ensuring that associatedtargetViewMetadataGroupKeyrecords are deleted when atargetViewMetadataGroupis removed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there is an ON DELETE CASCADE constraint between targetViewMetadataGroup and targetViewMetadataGroupKey # Expected result: The foreign key constraint should have ON DELETE CASCADE action. sqlite3 mydatabase.db "PRAGMA foreign_key_list('targetViewMetadataGroupKey');"Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for FOREIGN KEY constraints between targetViewMetadataGroup and targetViewMetadataGroupKey with ON DELETE CASCADE in migration and schema files. # Search in common schema directories rg -i "FOREIGN KEY.*targetViewMetadataGroupKey.*ON DELETE CASCADE" ./migrations ./schemasLength of output: 194
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all foreign key constraints for targetViewMetadataGroupKey to verify cascading deletes. rg -i "FOREIGN KEY.*targetViewMetadataGroupKey" ./migrations ./schemas | grep -i "ON DELETE CASCADE"Length of output: 205
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for FOREIGN KEY constraints between targetViewMetadataGroup and targetViewMetadataGroupKey with ON DELETE CASCADE across the entire codebase. rg -i "FOREIGN KEY.*targetViewMetadataGroupKey.*ON DELETE CASCADE" .Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any references to targetViewMetadataGroup and targetViewMetadataGroupKey to identify schema definitions. rg -i "targetViewMetadataGroup" .Length of output: 6458
| const targetMetadataAgg = ctx.db | ||
| .select({ | ||
| id: target.id, | ||
| metadata: sql<Record<string, string>>`jsonb_object_agg( | ||
| ${targetMetadata.key}, | ||
| ${targetMetadata.value} | ||
| )`.as("metadata"), | ||
| }) | ||
| .from(target) | ||
| .innerJoin(targetView, eq(target.workspaceId, targetView.workspaceId)) | ||
| .innerJoin( | ||
| targetMetadata, | ||
| and( | ||
| eq(target.id, targetMetadata.targetId), | ||
| inArray(targetMetadata.key, group.keys), | ||
| ), | ||
| ) | ||
| .where(eq(targetView.id, group.group.viewId)) | ||
| .groupBy(target.id) | ||
| .having( | ||
| sql<number>`COUNT(DISTINCT ${targetMetadata.key}) = ${group.keys.length}`, | ||
| ) | ||
| .as("target_metadata_agg"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review the complex query in the byId procedure for performance
The query in the byId procedure (lines 96-118) includes multiple joins and aggregations, which could affect performance on large datasets. Consider analyzing the query execution plan and optimizing it if necessary, perhaps by adding appropriate indexes or simplifying the query.
[performance]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/auth/src/utils/rbac.ts (1)
348-368: LGTM: New function getTargetViewMetadataGroupScopes addedThe new function correctly fetches the scope hierarchy for a
targetViewMetadataGroup. It follows the established pattern of other scope-fetching functions in this file.Consider handling the case where the query might return no results:
- .then(takeFirst); + .then(takeFirstOrNull); + if (result == null) { + throw new Error(`No targetViewMetadataGroup found with id: ${id}`); + } return [ // ... ];This change would make the function more robust against potential database inconsistencies or invalid ids.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/auth/src/utils/rbac.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/auth/src/utils/rbac.ts (2)
24-24: LGTM: New import added for targetViewMetadataGroupThe addition of
targetViewMetadataGroupto the imports is consistent with the new functionality being introduced in this file.
391-391: LGTM: scopeHandlers updated with new targetViewMetadataGroup entryThe addition of
targetViewMetadataGroupto thescopeHandlersobject is correct and necessary for integrating the new scope type into the existing RBAC system.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation