chore(root): add coderabbit pull request reviewer #93
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
❌ Deploy Preview for cuhacking-portal-dev failed. Why did it fail? →
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request adds a new configuration file File-Level Changes
Tips
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @JeremyFriesenGitHub - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider adding a comment in the configuration file emphasizing that this tool should supplement, not replace, human code reviews. This will help ensure that the team maintains a balance between automated and manual review processes.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟡 Security: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
.coderabbit.yaml (10)
1-1: The language setting looks good!The
languagesetting is correctly specified using the valid ISO language codeen-CA.
3-3: The tone instructions are clear and appropriate.The
tone_instructionssetting provides clear guidance to maintain a professional tone and provide constructive feedback during the review process.
5-5: The early access setting is correctly specified.The
early_accesssetting is correctly specified as a boolean value (false).
7-7: The free tier setting is correctly specified.The
enable_free_tiersetting is correctly specified as a boolean value (true).
9-23: The review settings are well-structured and include relevant sub-settings.The
reviewssettings are correctly structured and include various sub-settings related to the review process, such as profile, workflow, summaries, placeholders, status, poem, collapse, diagrams, abort, and auto-review. These sub-settings provide flexibility and customization options for the review process.
25-26: The chat settings are correctly specified.The
chatsettings are correctly structured and include theauto_replysub-setting, which is set totrue. This enables the auto-reply functionality for chat interactions.
28-35: The knowledge base settings are well-structured and include relevant sub-settings.The
knowledge_basesettings are correctly structured and include sub-settings for opt-out, learnings, issues, and pull requests. These sub-settings allow for customization of the knowledge base scope and behavior.
1-35: The indentation and formatting of the YAML file are consistent and enhance readability.The YAML file follows a consistent indentation using 2 spaces, which aligns with the recommended best practices. The empty lines between different sections improve the overall readability and organization of the configuration file.
1-35: The naming conventions used for the settings are consistent and meaningful.The setting names in the YAML file follow the snake_case convention consistently (e.g.,
tone_instructions,early_access). The names are descriptive and convey the purpose of each setting clearly, enhancing the readability and maintainability of the configuration file.
1-35: The overall structure and organization of the YAML file are well-designed and logical.The YAML file is well-structured and organized into logical sections, making it easy to navigate and understand the configuration settings. The sections are separated by empty lines, enhancing the readability. The settings are grouped based on their related functionality (e.g., reviews, chat, knowledge_base), which provides a clear and intuitive structure to the configuration file.
|
Nice, should I go ahead and remove sourcery? |
Pull request was closed
JeremyFriesenGitHub
deleted the
jeremy/chore/92-add-ai-bot-pull-request-reviewer
branch
This PR adds the yaml settings in the root dir of the project, which should also enable draft prs to be reviewed by coderabbit as well. Someone with organization permissions would also have to disable sourcery-ai to prevent flooding as well.
Summary by Sourcery
Add a .coderabbit.yaml file to configure Coderabbit as an automated pull request reviewer, enabling features such as draft PR reviews, high-level summaries, and auto-replies.
New Features:
Chores:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes