Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modernise 'cylc dump -t' print format. #6440

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hjoliver
Copy link
Member

@hjoliver hjoliver commented Oct 22, 2024

This has been annoying me forever.

Master 🤮:

$ cylc dump -t bug --flows
foo, 100, running, not-held, not-queued, not-runahead, [1]
foo, 101, waiting, not-held, not-queued, runahead, [1]
foo, 96, running, not-held, not-queued, not-runahead, [1]
foo, 97, running, not-held, not-queued, not-runahead, [1]
foo, 98, running, not-held, not-queued, not-runahead, [1]
foo, 99, running, not-held, not-queued, not-runahead, [1]

This branch:

$ cylc dump -t bug --flows
91/foo:running flows=[1]
92/foo:running flows=[1]
93/foo:running flows=[1]
94/foo:running flows=[1]
95/foo:running flows=[1]
96/foo:waiting (runahead) flows=[1]

QUESTION: is it OK to make the new format the default?
(As I have done, with -l/--legacy to generate the old format)

Check List

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md and added my name as a Code Contributor.
  • Contains logically grouped changes (else tidy your branch by rebase).
  • Does not contain off-topic changes (use other PRs for other changes).
  • Applied any dependency changes to both setup.cfg (and conda-environment.yml if present).
  • Tests are included (or explain why tests are not needed).
  • Changelog entry included if this is a change that can affect users
  • Cylc-Doc pull request opened if required at cylc/cylc-doc/pull/XXXX.
  • If this is a bug fix, PR should be raised against the relevant ?.?.x branch.

@hjoliver hjoliver added small question Flag this as a question for the next Cylc project meeting. could be better Not exactly a bug, but not ideal. labels Oct 22, 2024
@hjoliver hjoliver added this to the 8.4.0 milestone Oct 22, 2024
@hjoliver hjoliver self-assigned this Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
could be better Not exactly a bug, but not ideal. question Flag this as a question for the next Cylc project meeting. small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant