Dependency update

[daksh7011]

Description

• Update deps
• Improve usage of extension for elvis equality check

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Dependency update

How Has This Been Tested?

Automation and by running the project

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings

Summary by Sourcery

Update Kotlin plugin versions to 2.0.21 and enhance the isBot function with improved elvis equality check.

New Features:

• Improve the usage of the extension for elvis equality check in the isBot function.

Enhancements:

• Update Kotlin plugin versions from 2.0.20 to 2.0.21 in the project configuration files.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates dependencies and improves the usage of an extension function for checking bot status. The changes are minor but important for maintaining the project's up-to-date status and improving code clarity.

Class diagram for updated extension function

classDiagram
    class Message {
        - Boolean isBot
        + Boolean isBot()
        + Boolean isNotBot()
        + Boolean containsF()
        + Boolean containsNigga()
    }
    note for Message "Updated isBot() method to improve elvis equality check"

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Update Kotlin version from 2.0.20 to 2.0.21	Update Kotlin JVM plugin version to 2.0.21 Update Kotlin Serialization plugin version to 2.0.21 Update Kotlin version in libs.versions.toml to 2.0.21	settings.gradle.kts gradle/libs.versions.toml
Improve bot status check in Message extension function	Change isBot() function implementation from 'author?.isBot ?: true' to 'author?.isBot != false'	src/main/kotlin/troy/utils/Extensions.kt

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @daksh7011 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[github-actions]

Qodana Community for JVM

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [email protected]

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions