Skip to content

Conversation

@kwvg
Copy link
Collaborator

@kwvg kwvg commented Nov 4, 2025

Additional Information

Fix for potential race condition identified by CodeRabbit in dash#6933 (comment)

Breaking Changes

None expected.

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas (note: N/A)
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests (note: N/A)
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (note: N/A)
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@kwvg kwvg added this to the 23.1 milestone Nov 4, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

⚠️ Potential Merge Conflicts Detected

This PR has potential conflicts with the following open PRs:

Please coordinate with the authors of these PRs to avoid merge conflicts.

@kwvg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kwvg commented Nov 4, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Walkthrough

This PR refactors how chain lock information is accessed across three related files. The chainhelper.cpp file updates GetBestChainLockHeight() to use a dedicated accessor method instead of extracting the height from the full chain lock object. The miner.cpp and rawtransaction.cpp files introduce local variables to cache chain lock values, eliminating redundant calls to retrieve the same data. All modifications preserve existing function signatures and behavior.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • All changes follow consistent refactoring patterns: substituting direct accessor methods or caching local variables instead of repeated inline calls
  • Three files affected but with straightforward, homogeneous edits
  • No control flow modifications, signature changes, or new logic introduced
  • Focus areas: verify that the new accessor method (GetBestChainLockHeight()) and cached variables produce equivalent results to the original calls; confirm no performance side effects from the refactoring

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main purpose of the changeset: reusing best_clsig to avoid potential race conditions across three modified files.
Description check ✅ Passed The description clearly references the related issue and explains the fix is for a potential race condition, directly relating to the changeset's objectives.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4038de and c0faae0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/node/miner.cpp (1 hunks)
  • src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp
  • src/node/miner.cpp

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@kwvg kwvg marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2025 15:01
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK c0faae0

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit 98600eb into dashpay:develop Nov 4, 2025
79 of 86 checks passed
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 modified the milestones: 23.1, 23 Nov 7, 2025
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
…dition

c0faae0 fix: reuse best clsig to avoid potential race condition (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
98dc874 trivial: use `GetBestChainLockHeight()` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)

Pull request description:

  ## Additional Information

  Fix for potential race condition identified by CodeRabbit in [dash#6933](dashpay#6933) ([comment](dashpay#6933 (comment)))

  ## Breaking Changes

  None expected.

  ## Checklist

  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK c0faae0

Tree-SHA512: 74762c5d715405a32af4a58553c05dc2fd98cdb7f038a519cf244a7c84a6a536ff341d8e8f534dbb6a0df952730314f85c52738c4d5b2e72fa74a4f02a6b2237
PastaPastaPasta added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2025
6fd7059 chore: mark v23 as release (pasta)
ae08f53 docs: integrate 6946 release notes into final (pasta)
74a222d Merge #6946: feat: show seed on wallet creation (pasta)
877343a Merge #6943: fix: don't treat arrays/objects as string literals for composite methods (pasta)
00368fb Merge #6940: fix: reuse best clsig to avoid potential race condition (pasta)
8eceb98 Merge #6938: fix: logic error in `CheckDecryptionKey` (pasta)
3f30664 Merge #6929: fix: repair `makeseeds.py`, `getblockchaininfo[softforks]` help text, drop extra `generate`s from test, resolve macOS GID issue (pasta)
7ba4f1c Merge #6928: docs: update man pages for 23.0 (pasta)
a6c1d6a Merge #6920: chore: update minimum chain work, tx stats, checkpoints, seeds and SECURITY.md for v23 (pasta)
84df1f0 Merge #6909: chore: Translations 2025-10 (pasta)
a6449b1 Merge #6885: fix: improve governance/proposal dialog strings (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  See commits

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 6fd7059

Tree-SHA512: a0d93a61a4f4978fbe120bea832ce683a8ae7c16c892a381d91ddc4b25344c0f3ad3306a1a30a166a7dfa6e38e4532708587cc23cc372126828b8e22d141dc85
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants