Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FEATURE - BigQuery support for iceberg materialisations #1416

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

borjavb
Copy link

@borjavb borjavb commented Nov 27, 2024

resolves #1370

Problem

Bigquery has now support for native iceberg tables as a new type of materialisation.

Solution

Very naive approximation on how this could look like. We support both incrementality + the desired table format.

{{ config(
    materialized="incremental",
    table_format="iceberg",
    base_location = "location"
)
}}

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
  • This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX

@borjavb borjavb requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2024 23:31
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature] Add support for iceberg table format in table and incremental materialization
1 participant