Fixing sqlfluff link

[matthewshaver]

What are you changing in this pull request and why?

Fixing broken sqlfluff link and adding a few suggestions for exclusion

Checklist

• I have reviewed the Content style guide so my content adheres to these guidelines.
• The topic I'm writing about is for specific dbt version(s) and I have versioned it according to the version a whole page and/or version a block of content guidelines.
• I have added checklist item(s) to this list for anything anything that needs to happen before this PR is merged, such as "needs technical review" or "change base branch."
• The content in this PR requires a dbt release note, so I added one to the release notes page.

---

🚀 Deployment available! Here are the direct links to the updated files:

• https://docs-getdbt-com-git-linting-dbt-labs.vercel.app/best-practices/how-we-style/2-how-we-style-our-sql

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
docs-getdbt-com	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Nov 28, 2024 9:00am

[mirnawong1]

adding the backticks and might be good to clarify if taylor meant job run times too?

Suggested change

	- Excluding often unnecessary folders and files (such as target/, dbt_packages/, and macros/) can decrease lint run times.
	- Excluding unnecessary folders and files (such as `target/`, `dbt_packages/`, and `macros/`) can speed up linting, improve run times, and help you avoid irrelevant logs.