Bump @vocdoni/sdk package from v0.0.16 to v0.4.0

[andreslucena]

I've also added a couple commands that are useful to regenerate and view the database, and an output for the SDK version in the JS console

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #69 (9b37dff) into main (8ea2d6c) will decrease coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 9b37dff differs from pull request most recent head ced7380. Consider uploading reports for the commit ced7380 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #69      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.26%   92.14%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          87       87              
  Lines        1706     1706              
==========================================
- Hits         1574     1572       -2     
- Misses        132      134       +2     

Files	Coverage Δ
lib/decidim/vocdoni.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (+3.84%)	⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 Codecov offers a browser extension for seamless coverage viewing on GitHub. Try it in Chrome or Firefox today!

[andreslucena]

@microstudi just to be sure, you're removing this as its not necessary, because its already a dependency of decidim-dev, right?

[microstudi]

yes

[andreslucena]

@microstudi about the NPM packages problems that we had, its already solved upstream, in @vocdoni/sdk. Starting from v0.3.2 assert is already bundled there. I've bumped it to v0.4.0 as that's the last stable.

I've tried it out locally and it seems to work well. The thing is that there's a failing spec, but I think its in vocdoni side, as I see some server/SDK errors in the CI output:

2023-10-11 06:24:35 +0000 SEVERE: http://295.lvh.me:5328/packs-test/js/4538-2dd7a417cce069698b8a.js 1:4401 Uncaught L: 500 : vochain SendTx failed: createAccountTx: payl…b741 != 40867eec6f7929b5148f3418983f9a4096605d31)
2023-10-11 06:25:32 +0000 SEVERE: http://296.lvh.me:5328/packs-test/js/decidim_vocdoni_admin-510e7ba658f699b1a09d.js 1:22098 "RESULT => ERROR! " Error: 500 : vochain SendTx failed: createAccountTx: payload to and tx sender missmatch (ece1233c2173109ca8231b53dd1ed19e9615ec3f != ac336bcd5b6cad4ec6662a089fae4c7a17587653)

I guess they're related to the latest changes in their service:

0.4.0 - 2023-10-10

[BREAKING] New signatures for chain transactions.

So, @microstudi can you review this, merge and deploy to your server?

I understand that merging a breaking CI its not kosher, but as currently we're using an ancient version (3 months and 9 versions ago), currently is broken too. At least by my local tries, I've seen that it works sometimes 😄

[andreslucena]

I understand that merging a breaking CI its not kosher, but as currently we're using an ancient version (3 months and 9 versions ago), currently is broken too. At least by my local tries, I've seen that it works sometimes 😄

Vocdoni has mentioned thats because the v0.4.0 deploy isn't in staging yet, so I tried to v0.3.2 as that'd be more stable, but I still see that we have a failing spec... So as I say before, lets merge this and deploy it as its less broken than what we have now 🙈

[microstudi]

yes

[microstudi]

we need to check the tests!

[andreslucena]

@microstudi last time I talked with the people from Vocdoni, they told me that the failing spec is related to how they handle their versions and APIs while they're on development. Basically, for now:

v0.4.0 - works with the dev environment
v0.3.x - works with the stag environment

In a few days/weeks they'll migrate stag to be compatible with the v0.4.0 API. Until that time we have a couple options:

1. To change our environment to dev
2. To upgrade to v0.3.x instead of v0.4.0
3. To wait a couple days/weeks until stag is compatible with v0.4.0

As we don't have any current development in our side on the near future, I think it's better for now to just wait (3rd option) and this start blocking us then we can discuss the other options.

For the moment I sent a rerun to see if the stag/0.4.0 thing already happened 🤞🏽

[andreslucena]

Closing this as it was superseded by #72