Skip to content

This repository contains code to quantitatively evaluate instruction-tuned models such as Alpaca and Flan-T5 on held-out tasks.

License

Apache-2.0, MIT licenses found

Licenses found

Apache-2.0
LICENCE
MIT
LICENSE
Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

declare-lab/instruct-eval

Repository files navigation

🐫 🍮 📚 InstructEval: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models

Paper | Model | Leaderboard

🔥 If you are interested in IQ testing LLMs, check out our new work: AlgoPuzzleVQA

📣 Introducing Resta: Safety Re-alignment of Language Models. Paper Github

📣 Red-Eval, the benchmark for Safety Evaluation of LLMs has been added: Red-Eval

📣 Introducing Red-Eval to evaluate the safety of the LLMs using several jailbreaking prompts. With Red-Eval one could jailbreak/red-team GPT-4 with a 65.1% attack success rate and ChatGPT could be jailbroken 73% of the time as measured on DangerousQA and HarmfulQA benchmarks. More details are here: Code and Paper.

📣 We developed Flacuna by fine-tuning Vicuna-13B on the Flan collection. Flacuna is better than Vicuna at problem-solving. Access the model here https://huggingface.co/declare-lab/flacuna-13b-v1.0.

📣 The InstructEval benchmark and leaderboard have been released.

📣 The paper reporting Instruction Tuned LLMs on the InstructEval benchmark suite has been released on Arxiv. Read it here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.04757.pdf

📣 We are releasing IMPACT, a dataset for evaluating the writing capability of LLMs in four aspects: Informative, Professional, Argumentative, and Creative. Download it from Huggingface: https://huggingface.co/datasets/declare-lab/InstructEvalImpact.

📣 FLAN-T5 is also useful in text-to-audio generation. Find our work at https://github.com/declare-lab/tango if you are interested.

This repository contains code to evaluate instruction-tuned models such as Alpaca and Flan-T5 on held-out tasks. We aim to facilitate simple and convenient benchmarking across multiple tasks and models.

Why?

Instruction-tuned models such as Flan-T5 and Alpaca represent an exciting direction to approximate the performance of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT at lower cost. However, it is challenging to compare the performance of different models qualitatively. To evaluate how well the models generalize across a wide range of unseen and challenging tasks, we can use academic benchmarks such as MMLU and BBH. Compared to existing libraries such as evaluation-harness and HELM, this repo enables simple and convenient evaluation for multiple models. Notably, we support most models from HuggingFace Transformers 🤗 (check here for a list of models we support):

Results

For detailed results, please go to our leaderboard

Model Name Model Path Paper Size MMLU BBH DROP HumanEval
GPT-4 Link ? 86.4 80.9 67.0
ChatGPT Link ? 70.0 64.1 48.1
seq_to_seq google/flan-t5-xxl Link 11B 54.5 43.9
seq_to_seq google/flan-t5-xl Link 3B 49.2 40.2 56.3
llama eachadea/vicuna-13b Link 13B 49.7 37.1 32.9 15.2
llama decapoda-research/llama-13b-hf Link 13B 46.2 37.1 35.3 13.4
seq_to_seq declare-lab/flan-alpaca-gpt4-xl Link 3B 45.6 34.8
llama TheBloke/koala-13B-HF Link 13B 44.6 34.6 28.3 11.0
llama chavinlo/alpaca-native Link 7B 41.6 33.3 26.3 10.3
llama TheBloke/wizardLM-7B-HF Link 7B 36.4 32.9 15.2
chatglm THUDM/chatglm-6b Link 6B 36.1 31.3 44.2 3.1
llama decapoda-research/llama-7b-hf Link 7B 35.2 30.9 27.6 10.3
llama wombat-7b-gpt4-delta Link 7B 33.0 32.4 7.9
seq_to_seq bigscience/mt0-xl Link 3B 30.4
causal facebook/opt-iml-max-1.3b Link 1B 27.5 1.8
causal OpenAssistant/oasst-sft-4-pythia-12b-epoch-3.5 Link 12B 27.0 30.0 9.1
causal stabilityai/stablelm-base-alpha-7b Link 7B 26.2 1.8
causal databricks/dolly-v2-12b Link 12B 25.7 7.9
causal Salesforce/codegen-6B-mono Link 6B 27.4
causal togethercomputer/RedPajama-INCITE-Instruct-7B-v0.1 Link 7B 38.1 31.3 24.7 5.5

Example Usage

Evaluate on Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) which includes exam questions from 57 tasks such as mathematics, history, law, and medicine. We use 5-shot direct prompting and measure the exact-match score.

python main.py mmlu --model_name llama --model_path chavinlo/alpaca-native
# 0.4163936761145136

python main.py mmlu --model_name seq_to_seq --model_path google/flan-t5-xl 
# 0.49252243270189433

Evaluate on Big Bench Hard (BBH) which includes 23 challenging tasks for which PaLM (540B) performs below an average human rater. We use 3-shot direct prompting and measure the exact-match score.

python main.py bbh --model_name llama --model_path TheBloke/koala-13B-HF --load_8bit
# 0.3468942926723247

Evaluate on DROP which is a math question answering benchmark. We use 3-shot direct prompting and measure the exact-match score.

python main.py drop --model_name seq_to_seq --model_path google/flan-t5-xl 
# 0.5632458233890215

Evaluate on HumanEval which includes 164 coding questions in python. We use 0-shot direct prompting and measure the pass@1 score.

python main.py humaneval  --model_name llama --model_path eachadea/vicuna-13b --n_sample 1 --load_8bit
# {'pass@1': 0.1524390243902439}

Setup

Install dependencies and download data.

conda create -n instruct-eval python=3.8 -y
conda activate instruct-eval
pip install -r requirements.txt
mkdir -p data
wget https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~hendrycks/data.tar -O data/mmlu.tar
tar -xf data/mmlu.tar -C data && mv data/data data/mmlu

About

This repository contains code to quantitatively evaluate instruction-tuned models such as Alpaca and Flan-T5 on held-out tasks.

Topics

Resources

License

Apache-2.0, MIT licenses found

Licenses found

Apache-2.0
LICENCE
MIT
LICENSE

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •  

Languages