Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: validate unique names for monitors #666

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
93 changes: 86 additions & 7 deletions src/pepr/operator/crd/validators/package-validator.spec.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,13 +1,24 @@
import { afterEach, describe, expect, it, jest } from "@jest/globals";
import { PeprValidateRequest } from "pepr";
import { Allow, Direction, Expose, Gateway, Protocol, RemoteGenerated, Sso, UDSPackage } from "..";
import {
Allow,
Direction,
Expose,
Gateway,
Monitor,
Protocol,
RemoteGenerated,
Sso,
UDSPackage,
} from "..";
import { validator } from "./package-validator";

const makeMockReq = (
pkg: Partial<UDSPackage>,
exposeList: Partial<Expose>[],
allowList: Partial<Allow>[],
ssoClients: Partial<Sso>[],
monitorList: Partial<Monitor>[],
) => {
const defaultPkg: UDSPackage = {
metadata: {
Expand All @@ -20,6 +31,7 @@ const makeMockReq = (
allow: [],
},
sso: [],
monitor: [],
},
};

Expand All @@ -46,6 +58,16 @@ const makeMockReq = (
defaultPkg.spec!.sso?.push({ ...defaultClient, ...client });
}

for (const monitor of monitorList) {
const defaultMonitor: Monitor = {
description: "Default Monitor",
portName: "http-metrics",
selector: {},
targetPort: 8080,
};
defaultPkg.spec!.monitor?.push({ ...defaultMonitor, ...monitor });
}

return {
Raw: { ...defaultPkg, ...pkg },
Approve: jest.fn(),
Expand All @@ -59,13 +81,13 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
});

it("allows packages that have no issues", async () => {
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [{}], [{}], [{}]);
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [{}], [{}], [{}], [{}]);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Approve).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});

it("denies system namespaces", async () => {
const mockReq = makeMockReq({ metadata: { namespace: "kube-system" } }, [], [], []);
const mockReq = makeMockReq({ metadata: { namespace: "kube-system" } }, [], [], [], []);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
Expand All @@ -83,6 +105,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
],
[],
[],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -101,6 +124,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
],
[],
[],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -119,6 +143,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
],
[],
[],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -137,6 +162,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
],
[],
[],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -155,13 +181,14 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
],
[],
[],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});

it("denies virtual services that are the same name", async () => {
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [{}, {}], [], []);
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [{}, {}], [], [], []);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
Expand All @@ -177,6 +204,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
},
],
[],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -193,19 +221,20 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
},
],
[],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});

it("denies network policies that are the same name", async () => {
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [], [{}, {}], []);
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [], [{}, {}], [], []);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});

it("denies clients with clientIDs that are not unique", async () => {
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [], [], [{}, {}]);
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [], [], [{}, {}], []);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
Expand All @@ -220,6 +249,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
secretName: "HELLO_KITTEH",
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -235,6 +265,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
redirectUris: undefined,
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -251,6 +282,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
redirectUris: undefined,
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Approve).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -268,6 +300,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
standardFlowEnabled: true,
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -286,6 +319,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
secret: "app-client-secret",
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -304,6 +338,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
secretName: "app-k8s-secret",
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -322,6 +357,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
secretTemplate: {},
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -340,6 +376,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
enableAuthserviceSelector: {},
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -358,6 +395,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
protocol: Protocol.Saml,
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -374,6 +412,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
standardFlowEnabled: false,
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -391,6 +430,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
standardFlowEnabled: false,
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Approve).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -409,6 +449,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
},
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -425,6 +466,7 @@ describe("Test validation of Exemption CRs", () => {
enableAuthserviceSelector: undefined, // explicitly undefined
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Approve).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -448,6 +490,7 @@ describe("Test Allowed SSO Client Attributes", () => {
},
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -474,6 +517,7 @@ describe("Test Allowed SSO Client Attributes", () => {
},
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Approve).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -492,6 +536,7 @@ describe("Test Allowed SSO Client Attributes", () => {
},
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
Expand All @@ -510,14 +555,48 @@ describe("Test Allowed SSO Client Attributes", () => {
attributes: {},
},
],
[],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Approve).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});

it("allows clients with no attributes defined", async () => {
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [], [], [{}]);
const mockReq = makeMockReq({}, [], [], [{}], []);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Approve).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
});

describe("Test proper generation of a unique name for service monitors", () => {
afterEach(() => {
jest.resetAllMocks();
});

it("given an undefined description, a unique serviceMonitor name should be generated using the selector and portName fields", async () => {
const mockReq = makeMockReq(
{},
[],
[],
[],
[
{ description: undefined, portName: "http-foo", selector: { key: "foo" } },
{ description: undefined, portName: "http-bar", selector: { key: "bar" } },
],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
});

it("denies monitors that do not have unique descriptions", async () => {
const mockReq = makeMockReq(
{},
[],
[],
[],
[{ description: "Metrics" }, { description: "Metrics" }],
);
await validator(mockReq);
expect(mockReq.Deny).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
});
19 changes: 19 additions & 0 deletions src/pepr/operator/crd/validators/package-validator.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -141,5 +141,24 @@ export async function validator(req: PeprValidateRequest<UDSPackage>) {
}
}

const monitors = pkg.spec?.monitor ?? [];

// Ensure serviceMonitors use a unique description or selector/portName used for generating the resource name
const monitorNames = new Set<string>();

for (const monitor of monitors) {
const monitorName = sanitizeResourceName(
monitor.description || `${Object.values(monitor.selector)}-${monitor.portName}`,
);

if (monitorNames.has(monitorName)) {
return req.Deny(
`A serviceMonitor resource generated from the Package, ${pkg.metadata?.name} contains a duplicate name, please provide a unique description for each item in the monitor array`,
);
}

monitorNames.add(monitorName);
}

return req.Approve();
}