-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[write] Transaction append data API #393
Merged
zachschuermann
merged 24 commits into
delta-io:main
from
zachschuermann:transaction-data-path
Nov 8, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
24 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f4eabf0
wip: rough append data path
zachschuermann 59fd679
fix cherry pick
zachschuermann 5926d96
clean
zachschuermann 3c7dd37
add partition test
zachschuermann cc01511
more cleanup
zachschuermann a6290f2
use filemeta in parquet metadata
zachschuermann c7dac51
materialize write_metadata as vec
zachschuermann 8f1a446
modify write_json_files to take iterator of DeltaResult
zachschuermann b41d255
get_parquet_handler
zachschuermann 9838e35
comments
zachschuermann bdea457
address comments
zachschuermann 51e7cfb
unify read test code in common
zachschuermann c67862e
make a set_value helper for tests
zachschuermann b2f8414
add invalid schema test
zachschuermann 9a2ae28
fmt
zachschuermann edd6c4b
fix naming, add test
zachschuermann 1d4c914
fmt
zachschuermann 92d29a6
address comments
zachschuermann 4675231
add write_parquet test
zachschuermann a7455f8
fix comment
zachschuermann 0044d8e
comments, cleanup, test fix
zachschuermann 59166c2
address feedback
zachschuermann cab14d6
address feedback, add test for disallowing non-trailing slash in parq…
zachschuermann 796f2c4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into transaction-data-path
zachschuermann File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ideally we should be creating the expression evaluator just once?
Or do we worry the record batch schemas will somehow vary in e.g. field order?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well for now, writing single parquet files aren't we bound to the input schema? That is, for each input data we have (possibly) different input schema which then means different
logical_to_physical_expr
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Partition values could be one, I guess. Normally a partition-aware engine would want to pass us the partition value literals and let us decide whether to embed them in the outgoing data? And I guess some future table feature could conceivably require per-file awareness?