[test] add derive macro tests #514
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Niko <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #514 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 80.31% 80.31%
=======================================
Files 62 62
Lines 13541 13541
Branches 13541 13541
=======================================
Hits 10876 10876
Misses 2106 2106
Partials 559 559 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
scovich
reviewed
Nov 20, 2024
zachschuermann
changed the title
…with both single and multi-part paths Signed-off-by: Niko <[email protected]>
|
I added a second part that fixes an error in macro when fully-qulified multi-part types are used (forgot to push this earlier). Also added a passing docs test to verify, this test needs to be moved to normal test as part of #526 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
A simplified version of PR429 (to be closed/abandoned) using a doctest trick.
crate::todelta_kernel::in the generated code.developer-visibilityfeature instead of adding a new one as it seemed to fit the purposejustfileto run the new tests as part of existing testing processHow was this change tested?
All tests pass, including the newly added