-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: check constraints #1915
Merged
Merged
feat: check constraints #1915
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aec1add
feat: Add CHECK constraint functionality
scarman-db 34a3180
feat: check constraints
scarman-db 0c44f10
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into check-constraints
hntd187 3192887
feat: CHECK constraints
hntd187 d6020e8
feat: CHECK constraints, added check on table for initial add of cons…
hntd187 916e1e7
feat: CHECK constraints, added check on table for initial add of cons…
hntd187 e139f33
Merge branch 'main' into check-constraints
scarman-db 305bae9
feat: check constraints
scarman-db 8f913e7
feat: CHECK constraints, added check on table for initial add of cons…
hntd187 c83c7cf
Merge branch 'main' into check-constraints
hntd187 fba0b50
feat: CHECK constraints, added check on table for initial add of cons…
hntd187 811a6d4
feat: CHECK constraints addressing a lint
hntd187 e906f3c
feat: check constraints, removed physical test table, rewrote tests t…
scarman-db b475f29
Merge branch 'main' into check-constraints
scarman-db c5e23c1
feat: check constraints, fix a lint
scarman-db 9d88746
Merge branch 'main' into check-constraints
hntd187 1efd1fe
feat: CHECK constraints addressing a lint
hntd187 e4f59a3
feat: CHECK constraints, back out limiting features behind feature fl…
hntd187 62894a0
Merge branch 'main' into check-constraints
ion-elgreco File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just had a quick look, but i think
get_invariants
only errors when there are invariants defined, but in an illegal format. This is something we should return as an error.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was copied from the place it originally was prior to invariant enforcement in the data checker. Perhaps since this is not related to check constraints and slightly alters what would happen normally can we have a followup PR on it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure. but maybe add a TODO?