Akmal / feat: add RTL support to VideoPlayer component and its controls #405
Conversation
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Manifest Files |
|
Claude finished @akmal-deriv's task —— View job Code Review CompleteI've reviewed the RTL support implementation for the VideoPlayer component. Here's my comprehensive analysis: SummaryThe PR successfully adds RTL (right-to-left) support to the VideoPlayer component using a smart approach: forcing LTR direction on the video player itself while applying transform mirroring to the progress bar. This is a common pattern for video players in RTL interfaces. Priority Breakdown:
Detailed Review✅ What Works Well
Issues & Recommendations🟡 Medium Priority1. Incomplete Transform Application (video-player.scss:6) Location: Issue: The wrapper has &__wrapper {
position: relative;
direction: ltr !important;
}The comment on line 81 states: // Transform is now handled dynamically in the component based on RTL stateHowever, I don't see any dynamic transform being applied to the wrapper itself, only to the progress bar. Recommendation:
🟢 Low Priority - Code Quality2. Prop Default Value Redundancy (video-controls.tsx:53) Location: Issue: The is_rtl = false,But it's also marked as optional in the type definition (line 24). This is technically fine but creates redundancy. Recommendation: Consider whether this default should remain or if it should always be explicitly passed from the parent. 3. Test Coverage for scaleX Transform Location: Issue: The test "should render progress bar correctly in RTL mode without reversing direction" checks that elements exist but doesn't verify the actual Current test: it('should render progress bar correctly in RTL mode without reversing direction', () => {
(useIsRtl as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue(true);
render(<VideoPlayer {...mocked_props} />);
// ... checks for element existence only
});Recommendation: Add assertion to verify the transform style: const progress_bar = screen.getByTestId('dt_progress_bar');
expect(progress_bar).toHaveStyle({ transform: 'scaleX(-1)' });4. Error Handling Feedback Location: Issue: The try {
return useIsRtl();
} catch (_error) {
return false;
}Recommendation: Consider logging the error in development mode to help with debugging: try {
return useIsRtl();
} catch (error) {
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') {
console.warn('useIsRtl hook failed:', error);
}
return false;
}Security, Performance & Best Practices✅ Security: No security concerns identified. No XSS risks, no sensitive data exposure. ✅ Performance: No performance issues. The ✅ React Best Practices: Code follows React/TypeScript conventions properly. ✅ Type Safety: All new props are properly typed. Testing RecommendationsThe existing test coverage is good but could be enhanced:
Verdict✅ Approved for merge with minor improvements recommended. The implementation is solid and follows the correct pattern for RTL video player support. The identified issues are all low-to-medium priority and don't block the PR from being merged. They can be addressed in follow-up improvements if desired. |
Deploying derivatives-trader with
|
| Latest commit: |
a2ddc05
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://e32ce420.derivatives-trader.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://b-video-player-ltr.derivatives-trader.pages.dev |
packages/components/src/components/video-player/video-player.scss
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
🤖 AI Code Analysis Results📝 Manual Coding⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 0% 0 of 1,446 characters (0%) in newly added lines are AI-generated 📊 Analysis Summary
📋 Per-File Breakdown (New Lines Only)
📝 This PR contains traditional hand-written code. 📊 Raw Data (for dashboard){
"timestamp": "2025-11-05T06:30:43.331Z",
"repository": "deriv-com/derivatives-trader",
"branch": "unknown",
"author": "unknown",
"summary": {
"totalCharacters": 1446,
"aiCharacters": 0,
"percentage": 0
},
"files": [
{
"name": "packages/components/src/components/video-player/__tests__/video-player.spec.tsx",
"totalCharacters": 858,
"aiCharacters": 0,
"percentage": 0,
"status": "modified",
"hasAddedContent": true,
"addedContent": "\nimport { useIsRtl } from '@deriv/api';\nimport VideoPlayer from '../video-player';\n\njest.mock('@deriv/api', () => ({\n useIsRtl: jest.fn(() => false),\n}));\n it('should render progress bar correctly in RTL mode without reversing direction', () => {\n (useIsRtl as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue(true);\n\n render(<VideoPlayer {...mocked_props} />);\n const video = screen.getByTestId(video_data_testid);\n fireEvent.loadedData(video);\n\n expect(screen.getByTestId(player_..."
},
{
"name": "packages/components/src/components/video-player/video-controls.tsx",
"totalCharacters": 218,
"aiCharacters": 0,
"percentage": 0,
"status": "modified",
"hasAddedContent": true,
"addedContent": "import clsx from 'clsx';\n\n\nimport Text from '../text';\n\nimport VolumeControl from './volume-control';\n is_rtl?: boolean;\n is_rtl = false,\n style={{ transform: is_rtl ? 'scaleX(-1)' : 'scaleX(1)' }}"
},
{
"name": "packages/components/src/components/video-player/video-player.scss",
"totalCharacters": 179,
"aiCharacters": 0,
"percentage": 0,
"status": "modified",
"hasAddedContent": true,
"addedContent": " direction: ltr;\n direction: ltr;\n direction: ltr;\n direction: ltr;\n direction: ltr;\n direction: ltr;"
},
{
"name": "packages/components/src/components/video-player/video-player.tsx",
"totalCharacters": 191,
"aiCharacters": 0,
"percentage": 0,
"status": "modified",
"hasAddedContent": true,
"addedContent": "import throttle from 'lodash.throttle';\nimport { useDebounceCallback } from 'usehooks-ts';\n\n\nimport VideoOverlay from './video-overlay';\n } catch (_error) {\n is_rtl={is_rtl}"
}
]
}🚀 Analysis powered by ShiftAI • Analyzes only PR changes, not entire files |
|
Claude finished @akmal-deriv's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've reviewed the RTL support implementation for the VideoPlayer component. Here's my comprehensive analysis: SummaryThis PR successfully adds RTL (right-to-left) support to the VideoPlayer component. The implementation uses a smart approach: forcing LTR direction on the video player controls while applying CSS transform mirroring ( Priority Breakdown:
Detailed Review✅ What Works Well
Issues & Recommendations🟡 Medium Priority1. Critical Logic Fix: Removed Width Calculation Logic Location: Issue: The commit removed this important line from if (is_rtl) new_width = full_width - new_width;However, this removal appears to be intentional to match the new CSS-based transform approach. But I'm concerned this might cause incorrect behavior:
Recommendation:
2. Incomplete Test Coverage Location: Issue: The new RTL test only checks that elements exist, but doesn't verify:
Current test: it('should render progress bar correctly in RTL mode without reversing direction', () => {
(useIsRtl as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue(true);
render(<VideoPlayer {...mocked_props} />);
// ... only checks element existence
});Recommendation: Enhance the test: it('should render progress bar correctly in RTL mode without reversing direction', () => {
(useIsRtl as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue(true);
render(<VideoPlayer {...mocked_props} />);
const video = screen.getByTestId(video_data_testid);
fireEvent.loadedData(video);
const progress_bar = screen.getByTestId('dt_progress_bar');
expect(progress_bar).toHaveStyle({ transform: 'scaleX(-1)' });
// Test interaction: click progress bar in RTL mode
await userEvent.click(progress_bar);
// Add assertions to verify correct seek position
});🟢 Low Priority - Code Quality3. Misleading SCSS Comment Location: Issue: The comment states: // Transform is now handled dynamically in the component based on RTL stateBut this appears above the Recommendation:
4. Excessive Location: Issue: The PR adds
This seems excessive. If Recommendation:
5. Prop Default Value Redundancy Location: Issue: The
Recommendation: This is fine but consider the pattern: if all optional props use default values in destructuring, this is consistent. If not, consider standardizing the approach. 6. Import Organization Changes Location: Multiple files Issue: The PR includes import reordering changes that aren't related to the RTL feature:
Recommendation: While import organization is good, consider keeping refactoring separate from feature PRs to make reviews easier. For this PR, it's acceptable but something to keep in mind. Security, Performance & Best Practices✅ Security: No security concerns identified. No XSS risks, no sensitive data exposure. ✅ Performance: No performance issues. The ✅ React Best Practices: Code follows React/TypeScript conventions properly. Proper use of memoization with ✅ Type Safety: All new props are properly typed with TypeScript.
Testing RecommendationsRequired:
Nice to Have:
VerdictThe implementation follows the correct pattern for RTL video player support. However, there's a critical concern about whether progress bar interactions work correctly in RTL mode after removing the width calculation adjustment. Before merging:
Issues #3-6 are minor and don't block merging, but Issue #1 and #2 should be addressed to ensure the feature works correctly. |
|
Claude finished @akmal-deriv's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've thoroughly reviewed the RTL support implementation for the VideoPlayer component. Here's my comprehensive analysis: SummaryThis PR adds RTL (right-to-left) support to the VideoPlayer component using a CSS-based approach: forcing LTR direction on video controls while applying Priority Breakdown:
Detailed Review✅ What Works Well
Issues & Recommendations🔴 High Priority - Critical1. Removed Width Calculation for RTL (video-player.tsx:111) Issue: This line was removed in the changes: if (is_rtl) new_width = full_width - new_width;Analysis:
Expected Behavior:
Recommendation:
The CSS transform creates a visual mirror but doesn't fix the interaction logic. You need both the visual transform AND the coordinate adjustment. Suggested fix: let new_width =
((client_X - shift_X - (progress_bar?.getBoundingClientRect().left ?? 0)) /
(progress_bar?.getBoundingClientRect().width ?? 0)) *
full_width;
if (is_rtl) new_width = full_width - new_width; // Restore this line
if (new_width >= full_width) new_width = full_width;
if (new_width <= 0) new_width = 0;🟡 Medium Priority2. Insufficient Test Coverage (video-player.spec.tsx:140-156) Issue: The RTL test only verifies elements exist, not the actual behavior: it('should render progress bar correctly in RTL mode without reversing direction', () => {
(useIsRtl as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue(true);
render(<VideoPlayer {...mocked_props} />);
// ... only checks element existence
});Missing test coverage:
Recommendation: it('should render progress bar correctly in RTL mode without reversing direction', () => {
(useIsRtl as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue(true);
render(<VideoPlayer {...mocked_props} />);
const video = screen.getByTestId(video_data_testid);
fireEvent.loadedData(video);
const progress_bar = screen.getByTestId('dt_progress_bar');
// Verify the transform is applied
expect(progress_bar).toHaveStyle({ transform: 'scaleX(-1)' });
// Test interaction (if Issue #1 is fixed)
await userEvent.click(progress_bar);
// Add assertions for seek position
});🟢 Low Priority - Code Quality3. Excessive Issue: Added
Analysis: If Recommendation:
4. Import Reordering (Multiple Files) Issue: Includes unrelated import reorganization:
Recommendation: While import organization is good, keep refactoring separate from feature PRs for easier reviews. Acceptable here, but keep in mind for future PRs. Security, Performance & Best Practices✅ Security: No security concerns. No XSS risks, no sensitive data exposure. ✅ Performance: No issues. ✅ React/TypeScript Best Practices: Code follows conventions properly. Good use of ✅ Type Safety: All new props properly typed. Testing RecommendationsRequired Before Merge:
VerdictThe implementation follows the correct pattern, but there's a critical concern about progress bar interaction in RTL mode. Before merging:
The CSS transform mirrors the visual appearance but doesn't automatically adjust mouse coordinates. You likely need both the visual transform AND the coordinate adjustment for correct behavior. |
Description
Related Issue: Fixes #(issue)
Type of Change
Testing
Screenshots
(Add screenshots if UI changes)
Before:
After: