Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RPC calls signdata and checksignature #86

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

8lecramm
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #79.

If input is given in plaintext, "plain" should be set to 'true'.
The same applies to the response message of 'checksignature'.

curl http://localhost:40403/json_rpc -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":"0","method":"signdata","params":{"data":"Hello from mmarcel :)","plain":true}}' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' | jq .

{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": "0",
  "result": {
    "signed_data": "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"
  }
}
curl http://localhost:40403/json_rpc -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":"0","method":"checksignature","params":{"data":"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","plain":true}}' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' | jq .

{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": "0",
  "result": {
    "signer": "deto1qyrg0hj3uytxm7zalxuu7npxwspafwna76d9q9a7wcvtzxxm2v7wcqgfraaxf",
    "message": "Hello from mmarcel :)"
  }
}

@CaptainDero
Copy link
Contributor

Can we have better clarity on structure field names so that things can have better inference. Like during signature check data will always be hex so better name something which shows hex data type etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants