Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

additional testing and speed-ups of v2.0.0 #99

Merged
merged 36 commits into from
Feb 17, 2023
Merged

additional testing and speed-ups of v2.0.0 #99

merged 36 commits into from
Feb 17, 2023

Conversation

moustakas
Copy link
Member

This PR builds on #95 and #96 with an eye toward addressing #98, i.e., speed, while also fixing various bugs discovered in testing.

Although the algorithms are essentially identical to those in v2.0.0, this PR is a major refactor of how data and methods are passed between multiprocessing cores. In essence, in the v2.0.0 refactor of the code (compared to v1.0.1), I was relying on the idea that I could read the (~few hundred MB) templates and instantiate a one-stop-shop Class (FastFit) for all the fitting, and pass both the data and this Class to each individual process without any copying. However, for reasons I still don't fully understand, it appears that the individual processes were making their own local copy of everything (via an inefficient pickling process), which led to significant (and unacceptable) slowdowns.

This PR represents a major refactor of how the data and methods are handled, which leads to an enormous speed-up (a factor of 10 or more in some cases!) compared to v2.0.0.

For example, the partial log below illustrates fitting a single healpixel with 1008 targets in approximately 270 s (=4 m 30 s) with 128 cores on perlmutter. (With v2.0.0, the fitting would have taken well over 45 m with the same number of cores.) Of this time, roughly 25 s is spent on I/O, 100 s is spent pre-processing the spectra to determine initial line-widths (which could probably be sped up in a future PR), and 145 s is spent on the fitting. If I'm doing the math correctly, this comes out to an average of 18 s/core/object (145/1008*128=18) for the fitting, which is roughly consistent with #98.

After a little more testing of this PR, I'm planning to tag, run on a largish sample, and then (hopefully) process all of fuji, guadalupe, and then iron.

% time fastspec /global/cfs/cdirs/desi/spectro/redux/fuji/healpix/sv3/bright/260/26001/redrock-sv3-bright-26001.fits \
  -o fastspec-sv3-bright-26001-v2.1.fits.gz --mp 128

INFO:fastspecfit.py:118:parse: /global/homes/i/ioannis/code/desihub/fastspecfit/bin/fastspec /global/cfs/cdirs/desi/spectro/redux/fuji/healpix/sv3/bright/260/26001/redrock-sv3-bright-26001.fits -o fastspec-sv3-bright-26001-v2.1.fits.gz --mp 128
INFO:io.py:500:select: Reading and parsing 1 unique redrockfile(s).
INFO:io.py:559:select: specprod=fuji, coadd_type=healpix, survey=sv3, program=bright, healpix=26001
INFO:io.py:674:select: Updating QSO redshifts using a QN threshold of 0.95.
INFO:io.py:805:select: Gathered photometric metadata for 1008 objects in 4.66 sec
INFO:io.py:895:read_and_unpack: Reading 1008 spectra from /global/cfs/cdirs/desi/spectro/redux/fuji/healpix/sv3/bright/260/26001/coadd-sv3-bright-26001.fits
INFO:spectra.py:291:read_spectra: iotime 1.469 sec to read coadd-sv3-bright-26001.fits at 2023-02-04T12:50:56.975720
INFO:io.py:922:read_and_unpack: Coadding across cameras took 2.62 seconds.
INFO:continuum.py:421:_get_linesigma: Forbidden masking sigma=116 km/s and S/N=15
[snip]
INFO:emlines.py:2415:emline_specfit: Dropping broad-line model: S/N in either of the two reddest broad lines < 3.0.
INFO:emlines.py:2521:emline_specfit: Final line-fitting with 32 free parameters took 0.53 seconds [niter=3, rchi2=0.9561].
INFO:emlines.py:2521:emline_specfit: Final line-fitting with 34 free parameters took 0.88 seconds [niter=5, rchi2=0.9595].
INFO:emlines.py:2612:emline_specfit: Dn(4000)=0.753 in the emission-line subtracted spectrum.
INFO:emlines.py:2653:emline_specfit: Emission-line fitting took 3.21 seconds.
INFO:emlines.py:2612:emline_specfit: Dn(4000)=-1.599 in the emission-line subtracted spectrum.
INFO:emlines.py:2653:emline_specfit: Emission-line fitting took 6.43 seconds.
INFO:fastspecfit.py:205:fastspec: Fitting 1008 object(s) took 142.74 seconds.
INFO:io.py:1290:write_fastspecfit: Writing results for 1,008 objects to fastspec-sv3-bright-26001-v2.1.fits.gz
INFO:io.py:1345:write_fastspecfit: Writing out took 5.82 seconds.

real	4m32.046s
user	197m10.902s
sys	7m21.463s

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 5, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4094151993

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 1331 of 2556 (52.07%) changed or added relevant lines in 6 files are covered.
  • 295 unchanged lines in 5 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-9.4%) to 53.539%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
py/fastspecfit/util.py 6 8 75.0%
py/fastspecfit/io.py 235 292 80.48%
py/fastspecfit/continuum.py 444 632 70.25%
py/fastspecfit/fastspecfit.py 33 327 10.09%
py/fastspecfit/emlines.py 610 1294 47.14%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
py/fastspecfit/test/test_fastspecfit.py 1 97.92%
py/fastspecfit/emlines.py 2 48.85%
py/fastspecfit/continuum.py 34 73.05%
py/fastspecfit/io.py 127 68.51%
py/fastspecfit/fastspecfit.py 131 13.43%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 4014896532: -9.4%
Covered Lines: 2171
Relevant Lines: 4055

💛 - Coveralls

@moustakas moustakas merged commit 6107ffb into main Feb 17, 2023
@moustakas moustakas deleted the v2.0-testing branch February 17, 2023 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants