Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to Statix 1.2.1 #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2019
Merged

Update to Statix 1.2.1 #11

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2019

Conversation

samschlegel
Copy link
Member

This is needed for compatibility with newer ERTS releases
(related issue: lexmag/statix#42)

We should also look into maybe using https://github.com/bleacherreport/statix as I'm not a fan of how https://github.com/lexmag/statix calls Port.command/2 directly instead of using :gen_udp.send/4. It leads to a lot of custom code that will constantly be chasing releases as it's using an internal API

This is needed for compatibility with newer ERTS releases
lexmag/statix#42. We should also look into
maybe using bleacherreport's fork as I'm not a fan of calling
Port.command directly instead of using `:gen_udp.send`
@samschlegel samschlegel requested a review from ihumanable July 30, 2019 01:25
@ihumanable
Copy link
Contributor

@samschlegel I'm fine with updating this dependency. Switching to https://github.com/bleacherreport/statix doesn't seem to address the concern you raised, it appears that they are also just doing direct Port.command/2 calls (see https://github.com/bleacherreport/statix/blob/c14321f905887ca57efdd7743b05435b299eec05/lib/statix/conn.ex). I'm inclined to stay on lexmag's because it's the official repo and is still actively maintained.

@joladev
Copy link

joladev commented Sep 20, 2019

Yeah, that change is only on this branch iirc https://github.com/bleacherreport/statix/tree/otp-21.3.8.4-support

Looking forward to this update!

@zorkian zorkian merged commit 9df72ab into master Dec 27, 2019
@Fitblip Fitblip mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants