Improve bind:get/set coverage
#36250
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR improves documentation coverage for @bind:get/@bind:set syntax in Blazor data binding based on feedback from issue #36052 and #57962. The changes clarify why direct parameter mutation should be avoided and explain the benefits of using @bind:get/@bind:set syntax.
Key Changes:
- Added explanation of why direct component parameter modification should be avoided
- Documented the benefits and use cases for
@bind:get/@bind:setsyntax - Included an analogy using HTML's
<input>element to explain the concept - Added a reference to issue #57962 for additional context
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #36052
Distilled from Javier's remarks at dotnet/aspnetcore#57962 (comment).
I'm waiting on Javier to answer an offline question. Then, I'll call for review.
Internal previews