Skip to content

Conversation

@FrediKats
Copy link
Contributor

@FrediKats FrediKats commented Sep 2, 2023

Summary

  • Correct tabs
  • Add title "Property" (same as all other IDE* rules)
  • Add title property
  • Add missed bold formatting for some rules

Internal previews

Toggle expand/collapse
📄 File 🔗 Preview link
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1000.md CA1000: Do not declare static members on generic types
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1003.md "CA1003: Use generic event handler instances (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1005.md CA1005: Avoid excessive parameters on generic types
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1010.md docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1010
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1012.md CA1012: Abstract types should not have public constructors
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1014.md "CA1014: Mark assemblies with CLSCompliantAttribute (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1016.md CA1016: Mark assemblies with AssemblyVersionAttribute
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1017.md docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1017
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1018.md CA1018: Mark attributes with AttributeUsageAttribute
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1019.md "CA1019: Define accessors for attribute arguments (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1021.md CA1021: Avoid out parameters
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1024.md CA1024: Use properties where appropriate
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1027.md docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1027
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1028.md CA1028: Enum storage should be Int32
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1031.md "CA1031: Do not catch general exception types (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1032.md CA1032: Implement standard exception constructors
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1033.md docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1033
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1034.md CA1034: Nested types should not be visible
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1036.md "CA1036: Override methods on comparable types (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1040.md CA1040: Avoid empty interfaces
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1041.md CA1041: Provide ObsoleteAttribute message
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1043.md docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1043
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1044.md CA1044: Properties should not be write only
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1045.md "CA1045: Do not pass types by reference (code analysis)"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1046.md CA1046: Do not overload operator equals on reference types
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1835.md CA1835: Prefer the memory-based overloads of ReadAsync/WriteAsync methods in stream-based classes
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1851.md docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1851
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1853.md CA1853: Unnecessary call to 'Dictionary.ContainsKey(key)'
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1859.md "CA1859: Use concrete types when possible for improved performance"
docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca2016.md CA2016: Forward the CancellationToken parameter to methods that take one

Note
This table shows preview links for the 30 files with the most changes. For preview links for other files in this PR, select OpenPublishing.Build Details within checks.

@FrediKats FrediKats requested a review from gewarren as a code owner September 2, 2023 11:49
@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot added this to the September 2023 milestone Sep 2, 2023
@ghost ghost added the community-contribution Indicates PR is created by someone from the .NET community. label Sep 2, 2023
@FrediKats
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gewarren, sorry for PR size. I can split it and send 4 PR.

Copy link
Member

@IEvangelist IEvangelist left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, we'll :shipit: - thank you 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contribution Indicates PR is created by someone from the .NET community. dotnet-fundamentals/svc

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants