Skip to content

Conversation

@bitbonk
Copy link
Contributor

@bitbonk bitbonk commented Sep 2, 2023

Summary

This add some more details about a full release cycle where breaking changes in a major 2.0.0 release are deliberately suppressed.

Fixes #36859


Internal previews

📄 File 🔗 Preview link
docs/fundamentals/package-validation/baseline-version-validator.md Validate against a baseline package version

@bitbonk bitbonk requested a review from a team as a code owner September 2, 2023 15:36
@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot added this to the September 2023 milestone Sep 2, 2023
@ghost ghost added the community-contribution Indicates PR is created by someone from the .NET community. label Sep 2, 2023
Copy link
Member

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from one small comment, looks good to me. Thanks so much for improving our documentation.

@bitbonk
Copy link
Contributor Author

bitbonk commented Sep 3, 2023

@ViktorHofer What do we do with the one outdated screenshot? (see my comment in the PR).

Copy link
Member

@IEvangelist IEvangelist left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few nits, otherwise this looks great - thank you @bitbonk!

bitbonk and others added 2 commits September 5, 2023 22:57
Copy link
Member

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍👍👍

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer merged commit 9055d20 into dotnet:main Sep 6, 2023
@bitbonk bitbonk deleted the bitbonk-patch-1 branch September 6, 2023 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contribution Indicates PR is created by someone from the .NET community. dotnet-fundamentals/svc

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Article does not describe how to deliberately accept a breaking change

4 participants