Fix method signature format and clarify functional complements

[adegeo]

Summary

Originally by @steveberdy

Edits to GC.xml (issue #6790)

This fixes the space before the parentheses in the method signature, making it comply with official formatting rules.

Edits to Enumerable.xml (issue #5152)

These fixes add the slight detail that the Take and Skip methods in System.Linq are complements given first that the enumerable is not repeatable.

Fixes #6790
Fixes #5152

[adegeo]

@eiriktsarpalis this just has the updated wording you suggested in the other PR. Please approve. Cheers!

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @eiriktsarpalis
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

Summary

Originally by @steveberdy

Edits to GC.xml (issue #6790)

This fixes the space before the parentheses in the method signature, making it comply with official formatting rules.

Edits to Enumerable.xml (issue #5152)

These fixes add the slight detail that the Take and Skip methods in System.Linq are complements given first that the enumerable is not repeatable.

Fixes #6790
Fixes #5152

Author:	adegeo
Assignees:	-
Labels:	area-System.Linq
Milestone:	-

[eiriktsarpalis]

Thanks!

[opbld30]

Docs Build status updates of commit 45f3cac:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
xml/System.Linq/Enumerable.xml	✅Succeeded	View
xml/System/GC.xml	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Docs support channel

[gewarren]

The method signature is autogenerated, so that issue will have to be fixed in our tooling, not through manual edits.

[adegeo]

@gewarren where would that be?

[gewarren]

@adegeo I think here: https://github.com/mono/api-doc-tools

[adegeo]

@gewarren Oh, ha, I was thinking you meant the description needed that. I'll file a bug in that repo.

Opened mono/api-doc-tools#568