Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add libmsquic to Azure Linux images #1170

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024
Merged

Add libmsquic to Azure Linux images #1170

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

richlander
Copy link
Member

Followed the pattern from #1147.

@jkoritzinsky @sbomer

@richlander richlander enabled auto-merge (squash) August 13, 2024 00:09
@richlander richlander merged commit bb62e41 into main Aug 13, 2024
26 checks passed
@richlander richlander deleted the azure-linux-msquic branch August 13, 2024 02:25
@wfurt
Copy link
Member

wfurt commented Aug 13, 2024

since Azure Linux is based on Centos, I would expect we can find good enough RPM. If not, we should push msquic to add support. cc: @liveans

@jperrin
Copy link

jperrin commented Aug 13, 2024

Fine, I'll be the pedant for this issue.

Technically we're more closely aligned to Fedora, though a mix of a few releases. There are some packages in our 1.0 and 2.0 releases (openssl) that originated from CentOS, but it's not the majority.

Fedora's even talked about this recently! https://mastodon.social/@[email protected]/112928010076794066

@wfurt
Copy link
Member

wfurt commented Aug 14, 2024

the binary and package are identical for both at the moment. So it is really about feed preference until Azure Linux has it's own.

@richlander
Copy link
Member Author

richlander commented Aug 14, 2024

We can update the Dockerfile once the package is available. I think they will have to ready soon.

@liveans
Copy link
Member

liveans commented Aug 14, 2024

They are working on it microsoft/msquic#4455

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants